Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:8224306rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8224306lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0029127lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8224306lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0005544lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8224306lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0205210lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8224306lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0021713lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8224306pubmed:dateCreated1993-12-13lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8224306pubmed:abstractTextThis study investigated the inter-observer reproducibility of measurements of the optic nerve head as carried out with a clinical optic disc biometer. This instrument employs a modification of indirect ophthalmoscopy to enable measurement of fundus structures. Measurements were made independently by two observers on 84 eyes of 47 patients. The median inter-observer differences for each measurement were as follows: maximum disc diameter, 0.085 mm; minimum disc diameter, 0.080 mm; maximum cup diameter, 0.098 mm; minimum cup diameter, 0.078 mm; disc area, 0.225 mm2; neuroretinal rim area, 0.215 mm2. Utilising the above measurements, the instrument automatically calculates a 'rim index' to take account of variations in disc size. It then interprets the disc as normal, suspicious or glaucomatous. The optic disc biometer produced seriously conflicting interpretations in 8 discs, 7 of which had been judged by both observers to have indistinct boundaries of the disc or cup.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8224306pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8224306pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8224306pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8224306pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8224306pubmed:issn0950-222Xlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8224306pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MontgomeryD...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8224306pubmed:authorpubmed-author:PyottA AAAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8224306pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8224306pubmed:volume7 ( Pt 3)lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8224306pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8224306pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8224306pubmed:pagination452-6lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8224306pubmed:dateRevised2009-11-3lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8224306pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8224306-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8224306pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8224306-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8224306pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8224306-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8224306pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8224306-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8224306pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8224306-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8224306pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8224306-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8224306pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8224306-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8224306pubmed:year1993lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8224306pubmed:articleTitleInter-observer variation in clinical optic disc biometry.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8224306pubmed:affiliationDepartment of Ophthalmology, Southern General Hospital, Glasgow, UK.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8224306pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:8224306lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:8224306lld:pubmed