| pubmed-article:8214790 | rdf:type | pubmed:Citation | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8214790 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0001792 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:8214790 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0442504 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:8214790 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0332285 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:8214790 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0205199 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:8214790 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0678599 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:8214790 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0203939 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:8214790 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0179407 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:8214790 | pubmed:issue | 3 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8214790 | pubmed:dateCreated | 1993-11-18 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8214790 | pubmed:abstractText | The "Thomas" indirect technique for bracket attachment produces an interface not present in direct techniques, that is, an aged composite-sealant interface. Our primary goal was to determine if a weakened interface was produced by a modified (sealant was mixed prior to placement of brackets) Thomas indirect technique when the composite was aged for 7 days. The enamel-bracket system was investigated in vitro by comparison of shear bond strengths for metal and ceramic brackets bonded to bovine teeth by a direct and indirect method. Nearly all specimens failed at the bracket-composite interface and, subsequently, no difference was found between specimens placed by direct or indirect methods. No evidence was found to suggest that an aged composite would predispose the enamel-bracket system to fail at the sealant-composite interface. The ceramic brackets used in this investigation had lower bond strengths then metal ones, but the breaking loads were similar. | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8214790 | pubmed:language | eng | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8214790 | pubmed:journal | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8214790 | pubmed:citationSubset | D | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8214790 | pubmed:chemical | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8214790 | pubmed:chemical | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8214790 | pubmed:chemical | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8214790 | pubmed:chemical | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8214790 | pubmed:chemical | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8214790 | pubmed:status | MEDLINE | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8214790 | pubmed:issn | 0003-3219 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8214790 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:EnlowD HDH | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8214790 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:PhelpsA EAE | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8214790 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:RasmussenS... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8214790 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:ShiauJ YJY | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8214790 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:WolfG RGR | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8214790 | pubmed:issnType | Print | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8214790 | pubmed:volume | 63 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8214790 | pubmed:owner | NLM | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8214790 | pubmed:authorsComplete | Y | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8214790 | pubmed:pagination | 213-20 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8214790 | pubmed:dateRevised | 2003-11-14 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8214790 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:8214790-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8214790 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:8214790-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8214790 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:8214790-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8214790 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:8214790-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8214790 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:8214790-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8214790 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:8214790-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8214790 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:8214790-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8214790 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:8214790-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8214790 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:8214790-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8214790 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:8214790-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8214790 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:8214790-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8214790 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:8214790-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8214790 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:8214790-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8214790 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:8214790-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8214790 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:8214790-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8214790 | pubmed:year | 1993 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8214790 | pubmed:articleTitle | Bond strength of aged composites found in brackets placed by an indirect technique. | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8214790 | pubmed:affiliation | Dept. of Biologic and Materials Sciences, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor 48109-1078. | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8214790 | pubmed:publicationType | Journal Article | lld:pubmed |
