| pubmed-article:8169282 | rdf:type | pubmed:Citation | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8169282 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0222632 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:8169282 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0220825 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:8169282 | pubmed:issue | 3 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8169282 | pubmed:dateCreated | 1994-6-2 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8169282 | pubmed:abstractText | A natural exposure field trial a with positive control was conducted to evaluate bacteriological efficacy and teat conditioning qualities of an experimental postmilking teat dip. An experimental 1% iodine postmilking teat sanitizer with a 10% emollient system was compared with a 1% iodine plus 10% glycerin teat sanitizer. Efficacy of the two sanitizers was equivalent for all new IMI, major pathogens, and environmental pathogens. The products were not equivalent for efficacy against coliforms and coagulase-negative staphylococci. Fewer coliform IMI were diagnosed in the control group than in the treatment group. Differences were determined for efficacy against coagulase-negative staphylococci in favor of the treatment product. The products were equivalent for all clinical mastitis, including previously existing IMI that became clinical. The products were not equivalent for all or new clinical IMI with major pathogens, all environmental pathogens, or coliforms. Fewer infections were diagnosed in the control group than in the treatment group. Teat end and teat skin conditions improved with the use of the triple emollient, postmilking teat sanitizer under the winter conditions experienced during this field trial. | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8169282 | pubmed:language | eng | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8169282 | pubmed:journal | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8169282 | pubmed:citationSubset | IM | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8169282 | pubmed:chemical | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8169282 | pubmed:chemical | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8169282 | pubmed:status | MEDLINE | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8169282 | pubmed:month | Mar | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8169282 | pubmed:issn | 0022-0302 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8169282 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:RichardsD ADA | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8169282 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:PankeyJ WJW | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8169282 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:GoldbergJ JJJ | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8169282 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:DayL LLL | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8169282 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:DrechslerP... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8169282 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:LedbetterG... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8169282 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:HowardA BAB | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8169282 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:MurdoughP APA | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8169282 | pubmed:issnType | Print | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8169282 | pubmed:volume | 77 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8169282 | pubmed:owner | NLM | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8169282 | pubmed:authorsComplete | Y | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8169282 | pubmed:pagination | 740-7 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8169282 | pubmed:dateRevised | 2006-11-15 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8169282 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:8169282-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8169282 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:8169282-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8169282 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:8169282-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8169282 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:8169282-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8169282 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:8169282-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8169282 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:8169282-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8169282 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:8169282-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8169282 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:8169282-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8169282 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:8169282-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8169282 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:8169282-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8169282 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:8169282-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8169282 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:8169282-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8169282 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:8169282-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8169282 | pubmed:year | 1994 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8169282 | pubmed:articleTitle | Evaluation of a 1% iodophor postmilking teat sanitizer. | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8169282 | pubmed:affiliation | Department of Animal and Food Sciences, University of Vermont, Burlington 05405. | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8169282 | pubmed:publicationType | Journal Article | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8169282 | pubmed:publicationType | Clinical Trial | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8169282 | pubmed:publicationType | Comparative Study | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8169282 | pubmed:publicationType | Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't | lld:pubmed |
