Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:8121853rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8121853lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0043251lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8121853lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0728985lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8121853lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0184661lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8121853lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0220825lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8121853pubmed:issue4lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8121853pubmed:dateCreated1994-4-5lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8121853pubmed:abstractTextA cervical spine series that includes three views (ie, lateral, open-mouth odontoid, and anteroposterior) is usually adequate to exclude unstable injuries that have the potential for producing spinal cord injury. The films should be of the highest quality and need to be carefully and systematically viewed. Knowledge of cervical spine anatomy and of common types of injuries (including their mechanisms) is essential for accurate interpretation. Conventional tomography, computed tomography, and flexion and extension lateral views may be helpful when findings on the three-view series are equivocal. In patients with neurologic deficits, further radiographic evaluation is also warranted.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8121853pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8121853pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8121853pubmed:citationSubsetAIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8121853pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8121853pubmed:monthMarlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8121853pubmed:issn0032-5481lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8121853pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MontgomeryM...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8121853pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MontgomeryJ...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8121853pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8121853pubmed:volume95lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8121853pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8121853pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8121853pubmed:pagination173-4, 177-9, 182-4 passimlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8121853pubmed:dateRevised2005-11-16lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8121853pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8121853-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8121853pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8121853-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8121853pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8121853-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8121853pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8121853-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8121853pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8121853-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8121853pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8121853-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8121853pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8121853-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8121853pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8121853-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8121853pubmed:year1994lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8121853pubmed:articleTitleRadiographic evaluation of cervical spine trauma. Procedures to avoid catastrophe.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8121853pubmed:affiliationScott & White Clinic, Temple, TX 76508.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8121853pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8121853pubmed:publicationTypeReviewlld:pubmed