Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:8044185rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8044185lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0041951lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8044185lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1522613lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8044185lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0332161lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8044185lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0038257lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8044185lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0814633lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8044185lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0205173lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8044185lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0205210lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8044185lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0205352lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8044185lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1515926lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8044185pubmed:issue3lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8044185pubmed:dateCreated1994-8-30lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8044185pubmed:abstractTextThe authors describe a modification of the classical double J stent designed to improve its clinical acceptability. It consists of cutting the lower J so that the catheter, inserted in the ureter, does not protrude into the bladder. A loop of nonresorbable suture attached to the lower extremity of the stent is passed through the ureteric orifice, allowing its easy extraction. This procedure has been used in eight patients with no complications.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8044185pubmed:languagefrelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8044185pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8044185pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8044185pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8044185pubmed:monthJunlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8044185pubmed:issn1166-7087lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8044185pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SawhneySSlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8044185pubmed:authorpubmed-author:PonsotYYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8044185pubmed:authorpubmed-author:CarmelMMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8044185pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8044185pubmed:volume4lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8044185pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8044185pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8044185pubmed:pagination420-2lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8044185pubmed:dateRevised2006-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8044185pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8044185-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8044185pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8044185-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8044185pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8044185-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8044185pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8044185-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8044185pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8044185-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8044185pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8044185-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8044185pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8044185-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8044185pubmed:year1994lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8044185pubmed:articleTitle[A simple alteration in a ureteral double J stent to improve its clinical acceptability].lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8044185pubmed:affiliationService d'Urologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8044185pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8044185pubmed:publicationTypeEnglish Abstractlld:pubmed