Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:8028326rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8028326lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0028263lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8028326lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0597498lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8028326lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0542341lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8028326lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1280500lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8028326lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C2827424lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8028326pubmed:issue2lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8028326pubmed:dateCreated1994-8-8lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8028326pubmed:abstractTextArticulation theory predicts that a subject's absolute or masked threshold configuration will affect the slope of the speech recognition performance-intensity (P-I) function. This study was carried out to test that prediction. Performance-intensity functions for the Technisonic Studios W-22 recordings were obtained from 12 subjects with normal hearing. Four continuous thermal noise maskers, high-pass (HP) noise, white noise, ANSI noise, and talker-spectrum-matched (TSM) noise, were used to shape threshold. P-I function slopes for the averaged data ranged from about 1.6%/dB in HP noise to about 6.7%/dB in TSM noise. At low to moderate speech intensity levels, the positions and slopes of the P-I functions were accurately estimated by an articulation index-type model that included corrections for subject proficiency and for high- and low-frequency spread of masking. At higher intensity levels, performance was overestimated by the model.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8028326pubmed:granthttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8028326pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8028326pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8028326pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8028326pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8028326pubmed:monthAprlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8028326pubmed:issn0022-4685lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8028326pubmed:authorpubmed-author:TaylorRRlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8028326pubmed:authorpubmed-author:StudebakerG...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8028326pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SherbecoeR...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8028326pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8028326pubmed:volume37lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8028326pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8028326pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8028326pubmed:pagination439-48lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8028326pubmed:dateRevised2007-11-14lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8028326pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8028326-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8028326pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8028326-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8028326pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8028326-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8028326pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8028326-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8028326pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8028326-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8028326pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8028326-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8028326pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8028326-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8028326pubmed:year1994lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8028326pubmed:articleTitleThe effect of noise spectrum on speech recognition performance-intensity functions.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8028326pubmed:affiliationMemphis State University, Memphis Speech and Hearing Center, TN 38105.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8028326pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8028326pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8028326pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:8028326lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:8028326lld:pubmed