Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:8018964rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8018964lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0006142lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8018964lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0034802lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8018964lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1274040lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8018964lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0052080lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8018964lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0016441lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8018964lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0220901lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8018964lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1522609lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8018964lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0439234lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8018964lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1554112lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8018964lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0205225lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8018964pubmed:issue1lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8018964pubmed:dateCreated1994-7-29lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8018964pubmed:abstractTextIn a study on 214 patients with primary breast cancer (median follow-up 8.5 yr, maximum follow-up 15 yr), EGF-R was negatively correlated to estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor, whereas no association was found with age, lymph node status, and tumor size. Initially, after a follow-up of 5 yr, there was a tendency to a significant association between EGF-R levels and tumor recurrence rate (p = 0.08). Patients with tumors containing intermediate levels of EGF-R experienced a longer relapse-free survival (RFS) than did patients with tumors possessing lower or higher levels of EGF-R. This effect was most pronounced in the subgroup of patients with positive axillary lymph nodes. However, after 10 yr follow-up, this association appears to be lost (p = 0.28) as shown in this update. A similar phenomenon was observed for the ER. While at 5 yr follow-up ER status had significant prognostic value (p = 0.01), at 10 yr follow-up this significance also appears to be lost (p = 0.40). However, tumor size, lymph node status, grade, and PgR status maintained significant prognostic value by univariate analysis. Based on 40 separate studies comprising 5232 patients, the mean percentage of EGF-R positivity reported in breast cancer is 45% (range 14-91%). Nine out of 15 different studies showed in some way a significant negative association between EGF-R and RFS by univariate analysis, and 2 others showed a tendency to such a relationship. Of 7 studies applying multivariate analysis, two demonstrated an independent prognostic value of EGF-R for RFS and two others a tendency to a significant correlation, whereas three did not. It may be concluded that EGF-R status has more or less prognostic value in patients with primary breast cancer, but the prognostic power decreases with longer follow-up. Of great clinical significance is the association of EGF-R with hormone resistance. Therefore EGF-R status can be used for selection of type of treatment. Finally, EGF-R might be useful as a target for new treatment modalities.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8018964pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8018964pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8018964pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8018964pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8018964pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8018964pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8018964pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8018964pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8018964pubmed:monthJanlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8018964pubmed:issn0167-6806lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8018964pubmed:authorpubmed-author:KlijnJ GJGlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8018964pubmed:authorpubmed-author:PortengenHHlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8018964pubmed:authorpubmed-author:FoekensJ AJAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8018964pubmed:authorpubmed-author:Alexieva-Figu...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8018964pubmed:authorpubmed-author:van PuttenW...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8018964pubmed:authorpubmed-author:LookM PMPlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8018964pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8018964pubmed:volume29lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8018964pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8018964pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8018964pubmed:pagination73-83lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8018964pubmed:dateRevised2009-11-19lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8018964pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8018964-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8018964pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8018964-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8018964pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8018964-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8018964pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8018964-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8018964pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8018964-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8018964pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8018964-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8018964pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8018964-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8018964pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8018964-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8018964pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8018964-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8018964pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8018964-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8018964pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8018964-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8018964pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8018964-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8018964pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8018964-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8018964pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8018964-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8018964pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8018964-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8018964pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8018964-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8018964pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8018964-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8018964pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8018964-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8018964pubmed:year1994lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8018964pubmed:articleTitleThe prognostic value of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGF-R) in primary breast cancer: results of a 10 year follow-up study.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8018964pubmed:affiliationDepartment of Medical Oncology, Rotterdam Cancer Institute, The Netherlands.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8018964pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8018964pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8018964pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tlld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:8018964lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:8018964lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:8018964lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:8018964lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:8018964lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:8018964lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:8018964lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:8018964lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:8018964lld:pubmed