Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:8004292rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8004292lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0030106lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8004292lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0004099lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8004292lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C2349975lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8004292pubmed:issue6lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8004292pubmed:dateCreated1994-7-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8004292pubmed:abstractTextWe evaluated whether acute exposure to ozone (O3) enhances or produces exercise-induced asthma (EIA) in asthmatic subjects who have or do not have EIA, according to standardized exercise challenge. Twenty-one otherwise healthy asthmatic subjects, 19 to 40 yr of age, with forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) greater than 70% of predicted and methacholine hyperresponsiveness, underwent three 1-h exposures on separate days to 0.10 ppm ozone in filtered air (FA), 0.25 ppm ozone in FA, and FA alone (randomized order, single-blinded, crossover design). Of these subjects, 12 underwent an additional exposure to 0.40 ppm ozone in FA. The subjects performed intermittent light exercise (with mean ventilation of 27 L/min) while in an environmentally controlled chamber (21 degrees C and 40% relative humidity). After each exposure, the subjects rested 1 h in clean air and performed serial postexposure spirometry. The subjects then underwent a standardized exercise challenge in clean air, followed by serial spirometry for 60 min. No significant changes in FEV1 or forced vital capacity (FVC) were found following 1-h exposures to 0, 0.10, and 0.25 ppm ozone (regardless of EIA status). The 12 subjects who underwent all four exposures showed a significant excess reduction in FEV1 (-0.35 +/- 0.37 L or -9.6%) after 1-h exposure to 0.40 ppm O3 (p = 0.017), regardless of EIA status. Postexposure FEV1 returned to baseline levels within 1 h. Postexposure changes in FVC showed similar magnitude and time course but were not statistically significant across exposure conditions or EIA status.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8004292pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8004292pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8004292pubmed:citationSubsetAIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8004292pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8004292pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8004292pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8004292pubmed:monthJunlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8004292pubmed:issn1073-449Xlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8004292pubmed:authorpubmed-author:GongHHJrlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8004292pubmed:authorpubmed-author:LinnW SWSlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8004292pubmed:authorpubmed-author:LynessAAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8004292pubmed:authorpubmed-author:WeymerA RARlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8004292pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8004292pubmed:volume149lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8004292pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8004292pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8004292pubmed:pagination1413-9lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8004292pubmed:dateRevised2006-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8004292pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8004292-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8004292pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8004292-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8004292pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8004292-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8004292pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8004292-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8004292pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8004292-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8004292pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8004292-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8004292pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8004292-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8004292pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8004292-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8004292pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8004292-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8004292pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8004292-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8004292pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8004292-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8004292pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8004292-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8004292pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8004292-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8004292pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8004292-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8004292pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8004292-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8004292pubmed:year1994lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8004292pubmed:articleTitlePre-exposure to ozone does not enhance or produce exercise-induced asthma.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8004292pubmed:affiliationDepartment of Medicine, UCLA Medical Center.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8004292pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8004292pubmed:publicationTypeClinical Triallld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8004292pubmed:publicationTypeRandomized Controlled Triallld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8004292pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tlld:pubmed