| pubmed-article:7945822 | rdf:type | pubmed:Citation | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:7945822 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0002630 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:7945822 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0590323 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:7945822 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C2069329 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:7945822 | pubmed:issue | 4 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:7945822 | pubmed:dateCreated | 1994-12-1 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:7945822 | pubmed:abstractText | A prospective randomized clinical study to compare honey-impregnated gauze with amniotic membrane dressing in partial thickness burns was carried out. Sixty-four patients were studied. Forty of them were treated with honey-impregnated gauze and 24 were treated with amniotic membrane. The burns treated with honey healed earlier as compared to the amniotic membrane (mean 9.4 vs 17.5 days) (P < 0.001). Residual scars were noted in 8 per cent of patients treated with honey-impregnated gauze and in 16.6 per cent of cases treated with amniotic membrane (P < 0.001). | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:7945822 | pubmed:language | eng | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:7945822 | pubmed:journal | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:7945822 | pubmed:citationSubset | IM | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:7945822 | pubmed:status | MEDLINE | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:7945822 | pubmed:month | Aug | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:7945822 | pubmed:issn | 0305-4179 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:7945822 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:SubrahmanyanL... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:7945822 | pubmed:issnType | Print | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:7945822 | pubmed:volume | 20 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:7945822 | pubmed:owner | NLM | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:7945822 | pubmed:authorsComplete | Y | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:7945822 | pubmed:pagination | 331-3 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:7945822 | pubmed:dateRevised | 2006-11-15 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:7945822 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:7945822-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:7945822 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:7945822-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:7945822 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:7945822-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:7945822 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:7945822-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:7945822 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:7945822-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:7945822 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:7945822-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:7945822 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:7945822-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:7945822 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:7945822-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:7945822 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:7945822-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:7945822 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:7945822-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:7945822 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:7945822-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:7945822 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:7945822-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:7945822 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:7945822-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:7945822 | pubmed:year | 1994 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:7945822 | pubmed:articleTitle | Honey-impregnated gauze versus amniotic membrane in the treatment of burns. | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:7945822 | pubmed:affiliation | Department of Surgery, Dr V. M. Medical College, Solapur, Maharashtra, India. | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:7945822 | pubmed:publicationType | Journal Article | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:7945822 | pubmed:publicationType | Clinical Trial | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:7945822 | pubmed:publicationType | Comparative Study | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:7945822 | pubmed:publicationType | Randomized Controlled Trial | lld:pubmed |
| http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:7945822 | lld:pubmed |
| http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:7945822 | lld:pubmed |
