Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:7923779rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7923779lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0031809lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7923779lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0205101lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7923779lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0312452lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7923779lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0370097lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7923779lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0020980lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7923779lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1705241lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7923779lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0680536lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7923779lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0220922lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7923779lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0332306lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7923779lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1705242lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7923779lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C2728259lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7923779pubmed:issue10lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7923779pubmed:dateCreated1994-11-7lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7923779pubmed:abstractTextData collected in a national external quality assessment program for free thyroxine (fT4) and free triiodothyronine (fT3) were analyzed to evaluate the performance of 10 method/kits with 26 control samples distributed to approximately 170 laboratories. The control materials were normal serum pools, pooled sera supplemented with thyroid hormones, a pregnancy serum pool, serum pooled from patients with familial dysalbuminemic hyperthyroxinemia (FDH), and a normal serum pool progressively diluted. The between-laboratory variability (CV) was approximately constant in normal and supplemented pools for fT4 (15.3%) and fT3 (24.0%) but markedly increased in diluted, pregnancy, and FDH pools (21.9-35.2% for fT4 and 28.6-66.5% for fT3) because of increases in systematic between-kit differences in control samples with altered binding-protein capacity. Moreover, free hormone concentrations measured in progressively diluted sera averaged lower than in undiluted samples. This decrease of concentration was less for back-titration or labeled-antibody techniques and greater for labeled-analog methods; only the method involving adsorption to cross-linked dextran (Sephadex) was unaffected by dilution. Evaluation of the reproducibility of the method/kits showed between-assay, between-laboratory precision ranging from 7.8% to 17.0% for fT4 and from 9.8% to 20.3% for fT3.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7923779pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7923779pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7923779pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7923779pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7923779pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7923779pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7923779pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7923779pubmed:monthOctlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7923779pubmed:issn0009-9147lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7923779pubmed:authorpubmed-author:PiloAAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7923779pubmed:authorpubmed-author:ZucchelliG...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7923779pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MasiniSSlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7923779pubmed:authorpubmed-author:ChiesaM RMRlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7923779pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7923779pubmed:volume40lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7923779pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7923779pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7923779pubmed:pagination1956-61lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7923779pubmed:dateRevised2006-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7923779pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7923779-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7923779pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7923779-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7923779pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7923779-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7923779pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7923779-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7923779pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7923779-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7923779pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7923779-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7923779pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7923779-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7923779pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7923779-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7923779pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7923779-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7923779pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7923779-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7923779pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7923779-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7923779pubmed:year1994lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7923779pubmed:articleTitleSystematic differences between commercial immunoassays for free thyroxine and free triiodothyronine in an external quality assessment program.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7923779pubmed:affiliationCNR-Institute of Clinical Physiology, Pisa, Italy.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7923779pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7923779pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed