Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:7880355rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7880355lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C2926606lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7880355lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0019638lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7880355lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0003904lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7880355lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C2607943lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7880355lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0011164lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7880355lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1511790lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7880355lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0024485lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7880355lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1707520lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7880355lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1552430lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7880355lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1555766lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7880355pubmed:issue6lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7880355pubmed:dateCreated1995-4-12lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7880355pubmed:abstractTextIn a prospective double-blind study, the capability of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and arthroscopy in the detection and grading of meniscal degenerations is evaluated by correlating MRI findings and arthroscopic diagnoses with a histologic grading model. In 82.8% of our results, grading based on MRI studies corresponded with the histologic grading classification. In 12 instances a meniscal degeneration verified at light microscopy was not detected at MRI, whereas in 15 cases tomography yielded a false-positive result. The overall accuracy was calculated to be 0.93 with a specificity of 0.79 and a sensitivity of 0.96. Concerning the evaluation of meniscal degenerations, MRI provides a positive predictive value of 0.95 and a negative predictive value of 0.82. Compared with the diagnostic specificity of the anterior and posterior zones, that of the intermediate segment of the meniscus is significantly reduced (p < 0.001). At arthroscopy, meniscal degenerations were diagnosed with an overall accuracy of 38.8%, a sensitivity of 27.5%, and a specificity of 75.5%. In 80 cases of grade 3 abnormalities, five false-negative diagnoses were made initially. These results suggest that MRI offers a valuable diagnostic potential providing reliable information about the internal consistency of the meniscus complementary to diagnostic arthroscopy.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7880355pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7880355pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7880355pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7880355pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7880355pubmed:monthDeclld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7880355pubmed:issn0749-8063lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7880355pubmed:authorpubmed-author:RaunestJJlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7880355pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BürrigK FKFlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7880355pubmed:authorpubmed-author:HötzingerHHlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7880355pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7880355pubmed:volume10lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7880355pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7880355pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7880355pubmed:pagination634-40lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7880355pubmed:dateRevised2006-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7880355pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7880355-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7880355pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7880355-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7880355pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7880355-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7880355pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7880355-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7880355pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7880355-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7880355pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7880355-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7880355pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7880355-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7880355pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7880355-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7880355pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7880355-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7880355pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7880355-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7880355pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7880355-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7880355pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7880355-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7880355pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7880355-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7880355pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7880355-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7880355pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7880355-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7880355pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7880355-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7880355pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7880355-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7880355pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7880355-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7880355pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7880355-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7880355pubmed:year1994lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7880355pubmed:articleTitleMagnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and arthroscopy in the detection of meniscal degenerations: correlation of arthroscopy and MRI with histology findings.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7880355pubmed:affiliationDepartment of General Surgery and Traumatology, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7880355pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7880355pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:7880355lld:pubmed