Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:7824775rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7824775lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0019638lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7824775lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0040132lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7824775lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0010819lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7824775lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0221198lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7824775lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0011900lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7824775lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1707455lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7824775lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C2347947lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7824775pubmed:issue5lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7824775pubmed:dateCreated1995-2-16lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7824775pubmed:abstractTextThe authors report their personal experience in 160 patients affected with thyroid conditions examined with US and fine needle aspiration (FNA). Benign nodular hyperplasia, cystic-colloid nodular hyperplasia, colloid cyst, hemorrhagic cyst, adenoma, thyroiditis, follicular and malignant lesions were studied. The latter consisted of 5 papillary carcinomas, 6 follicular carcinomas, 1 medullary carcinoma, 1 Hürthle cell carcinoma, 1 lymphoma and 1 metastatic lesion. The following US patterns were observed: 69.2% of the malignant lesions were hypoechoic, 15.4% were hyperechoic and 7.7% isoechoic. Most of the malignant lesions (84.6%) had inhomogeneous echo texture; 46.1% of them exhibited peripheral microcalcifications. US diagnoses were compared with cytologic and/or histologic findings to assess US accuracy. In the surgical patients US accuracy reached 78.6% in benign lesions and 61.5% in malignant lesions. Since US alone fails to yield enough pieces of information for an accurate diagnosis to be made, especially when malignant lesions are concerned, FNA should be used, while trying to define the actual role of color-Doppler US.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7824775pubmed:languageitalld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7824775pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7824775pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7824775pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7824775pubmed:monthNovlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7824775pubmed:issn0033-8362lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7824775pubmed:authorpubmed-author:DrogtJJlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7824775pubmed:authorpubmed-author:RagonaRRlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7824775pubmed:authorpubmed-author:PapottiMMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7824775pubmed:authorpubmed-author:GarrettiLLlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7824775pubmed:authorpubmed-author:CesaraniFFlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7824775pubmed:authorpubmed-author:CassinisM CMClld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7824775pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7824775pubmed:volume88lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7824775pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7824775pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7824775pubmed:pagination598-605lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7824775pubmed:dateRevised2008-10-21lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7824775pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7824775-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7824775pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7824775-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7824775pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7824775-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7824775pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7824775-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7824775pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7824775-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7824775pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7824775-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7824775pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7824775-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7824775pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7824775-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7824775pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7824775-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7824775pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7824775-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7824775pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7824775-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7824775pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7824775-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7824775pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7824775-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7824775pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7824775-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7824775pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7824775-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7824775pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7824775-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7824775pubmed:year1994lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7824775pubmed:articleTitle[The reliability of echotomographic diagnosis in assessing thyroid lesions. A comparison with cytology and histology].lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7824775pubmed:affiliationIstituto di Radiologia, Università di Torino.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7824775pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7824775pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7824775pubmed:publicationTypeEnglish Abstractlld:pubmed