Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:7819596rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7819596lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0008972lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7819596lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0087111lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7819596lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1096063lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7819596lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0085297lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7819596lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0178602lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7819596lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1274040lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7819596lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0243095lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7819596pubmed:issue3lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7819596pubmed:dateCreated1995-2-14lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7819596pubmed:abstractTextSixty-one refractory epileptic patients (46 with partial epilepsy) were treated with intravenous immunoglobulins in a controlled double-blind/dose finding clinical trial; 18 (7 females, mean age 18.5 years) received placebo, while 14 (3 females, mean age 26.2 years, 2 excluded), 14 (4 females, mean age 24.6 years, 1 excluded) and 15 (5 females, mean age 24.4 years) patients received 100, 250 and 400 mg/kg per infusion of intravenous immunoglobulins, respectively. Seven perfusions were scheduled, four the 1st week, and thereafter one during the 2nd, 3rd and 6th week. The patients were followed for 6 months. An optional infusion was given at the end of the study. A comparison of the mean number of seizures per day was made between the baseline (4 weeks before the first infusion) and the 6th month after the first infusion. Patients were considered responders if they had a decrease of at least 50% in daily seizure frequency at the end of the study compared with the baseline. We did not find severe adverse events. One patient had to stop infusions for possible related side effects (vomiting). When all patients were analyzed together, we found a positive trend in favor of intravenous immunoglobulin treatment, but this was not significant (P = 0.095). There was no relationship between dose and efficacy (P = 0.31). When the largest group with partial epilepsy was analyzed separately, we noted 19 responders in the test group, compared with 2 in the placebo.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7819596pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7819596pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7819596pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7819596pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7819596pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7819596pubmed:issn0940-5437lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7819596pubmed:authorpubmed-author:WieserH GHGlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7819596pubmed:authorpubmed-author:DelireMMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7819596pubmed:authorpubmed-author:van...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7819596pubmed:authorpubmed-author:Schmitz-Moorm...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7819596pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7819596pubmed:volume24lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7819596pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7819596pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7819596pubmed:pagination162-6lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7819596pubmed:dateRevised2004-11-17lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7819596pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7819596-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7819596pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7819596-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7819596pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7819596-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7819596pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7819596-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7819596pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7819596-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7819596pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7819596-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7819596pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7819596-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7819596pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7819596-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7819596pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7819596-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7819596pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7819596-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7819596pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7819596-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7819596pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7819596-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7819596pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7819596-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7819596pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7819596-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7819596pubmed:year1994lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7819596pubmed:articleTitleTreatment of refractory epilepsy with intravenous immunoglobulins. Results of the first double-blind/dose finding clinical study.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7819596pubmed:affiliationCentre Neurologique William Lennox, Ottignies, Belgium.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7819596pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7819596pubmed:publicationTypeClinical Triallld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7819596pubmed:publicationTypeRandomized Controlled Triallld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7819596pubmed:publicationTypeMulticenter Studylld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:7819596lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:7819596lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:7819596lld:pubmed