Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:7801858rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7801858lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0087111lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7801858lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0205042lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7801858lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C2936173lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7801858lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0205178lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7801858lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C2348535lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7801858lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0595454lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7801858lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1522701lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7801858lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1521802lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7801858pubmed:issue1lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7801858pubmed:dateCreated1995-1-23lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7801858pubmed:abstractTextThe effect of the Flex-Stent on immediate and long-term angiographic and clinical results for acute and threatened closure was evaluated in 42 consecutive patients with coronary arterial segments < 3.0 mm in diameter after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA). Forty-two consecutive patients were treated with Flex-Stent (2.0 or 2.5 mm) for acute or threatened closure complicating PTCA. Ten patients (24%) had acute closure and 32 (76%) had threatened closure with a residual luminal stenosis of > 50%. Successful stent deployment was achieved in 40 patients (95%) with a primary clinical success rate of 90% (freedom from myocardial infarction, coronary artery surgery, and death). In-hospital complications occurred in 5 patients (some patients fell into more than one category): 3 (7.1%) had coronary bypass surgery, 1 (2.4%) had acute stent thrombosis, 1 (2.4%) had subacute stent thrombosis, 2 (4.8%) had myocardial infarction, and 1 (2.4%) had dextran allergy. There was no hospital death. Clinical follow-up was complete at a mean of 14.8 +/- 7.6 months, and recurrence of angina was noted in 20 of 38 eligible patients (53%). Angiographic restenosis was found in 19 of 29 patients (66%) (76.3% of eligible patients) on follow-up angiography (mean 5.9 +/- 4.6 months). Fourteen patients (74%) underwent successful repeat PTCA at the stented site, 4 of 38 patients (11%) had bypass surgery. Intracoronary stenting in the treatment of acute or threatened closure in arteries < 3.0 mm is effective in improving the acute clinical outcome and is a viable nonsurgical alternative for this subset of patients.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7801858pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7801858pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7801858pubmed:citationSubsetAIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7801858pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7801858pubmed:monthJanlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7801858pubmed:issn0002-9149lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7801858pubmed:authorpubmed-author:LeeK CKClld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7801858pubmed:authorpubmed-author:NgAAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7801858pubmed:authorpubmed-author:ChakrabortyBBlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7801858pubmed:authorpubmed-author:TanA TATlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7801858pubmed:authorpubmed-author:ChaiC KCKlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7801858pubmed:authorpubmed-author:KohT HTHlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7801858pubmed:authorpubmed-author:LOWlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7801858pubmed:authorpubmed-author:GunawanS ASAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7801858pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7801858pubmed:day1lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7801858pubmed:volume75lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7801858pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7801858pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7801858pubmed:pagination23-5lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7801858pubmed:dateRevised2010-11-18lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7801858pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7801858-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7801858pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7801858-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7801858pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7801858-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7801858pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7801858-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7801858pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7801858-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7801858pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7801858-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7801858pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7801858-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7801858pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7801858-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7801858pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7801858-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7801858pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7801858-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7801858pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7801858-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7801858pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7801858-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7801858pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7801858-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7801858pubmed:year1995lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7801858pubmed:articleTitleIntracoronary stenting in the treatment of acute or threatened closure in angiographically small coronary arteries (< 3.0 mm) complicating percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7801858pubmed:affiliationDepartment of Cardiology, Singapore General Hospital.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7801858pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:7801858lld:pubmed