Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:7704460rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7704460lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0003873lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7704460lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0012634lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7704460lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0205245lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7704460lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0441655lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7704460lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0022877lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7704460lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1707455lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7704460lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0918012lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7704460lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0079809lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7704460pubmed:issue2lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7704460pubmed:dateCreated1995-5-9lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7704460pubmed:abstractTextThis study compares functional changes to change in measures of disease activity following the introduction of slow-acting anti-rheumatic drugs (SAARD) in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Clinical and laboratory variables were simultaneously monitored at 6-monthly intervals, over approximately 18 months. Function was measured by a performance testing, the Keitel function index (KFI), which was divided into sections representing small and large joints [hand (HFI); wrist (WFI) and limb function index (LFI)]. One-hundred-and-fifteen patients were studied, of whom 21 were male. The mean age of the subjects was 49 yr (S.D. +/- 12) and mean duration of disease 7 yr (S.D. +/- 7). The mean KFI at entry was 38 (S.D. +/- 18) while at the end of the study it was 31 (S.D. +/- 17) (P < 0.0001). The change in KFI following therapy correlated with the change in Ritchie articular index (RAI) (r = 0.4; P < 0.0001), early morning stiffness (EMS) (r = 0.3; P = 0.004), swollen joint count (JC) (r = 0.4; P = 0.0005), C-reactive protein (CRP) (r = 0.2; P < 0.05) and Lansbury systemic index (LSI) (r = 0.35; P = 0.002), but not with change in Westergren erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) or change in time to onset of fatigue. Multiple regression analysis showed that 32% of the variation in KFI at the end of the study could be predicted by a combination of ESR, sulphasalazine therapy, RAI, disease duration and chloroquine treatment at onset (P < 0.05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7704460pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7704460pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7704460pubmed:citationSubsetAIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7704460pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7704460pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7704460pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7704460pubmed:monthFeblld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7704460pubmed:issn0263-7103lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7704460pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BrownG MGMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7704460pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SmithP RPRlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7704460pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MeyersO LOLlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7704460pubmed:authorpubmed-author:KalleA EAElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7704460pubmed:authorpubmed-author:ChaltonDDlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7704460pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7704460pubmed:volume34lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7704460pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7704460pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7704460pubmed:pagination141-9lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7704460pubmed:dateRevised2006-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7704460pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7704460-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7704460pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7704460-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7704460pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7704460-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7704460pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7704460-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7704460pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7704460-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7704460pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7704460-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7704460pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7704460-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7704460pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7704460-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7704460pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7704460-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7704460pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7704460-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7704460pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7704460-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7704460pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7704460-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7704460pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7704460-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7704460pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7704460-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7704460pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7704460-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7704460pubmed:year1995lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7704460pubmed:articleTitleResponsiveness of Keitel functional index compared with laboratory measures of disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7704460pubmed:affiliationDepartment of Medicine, Groote Schuur Hospital, Cape, South Africa.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7704460pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7704460pubmed:publicationTypeClinical Triallld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7704460pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7704460pubmed:publicationTypeRandomized Controlled Triallld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7704460pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tlld:pubmed