Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:7620406rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7620406lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0031809lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7620406lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0023884lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7620406lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0449468lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7620406lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0860888lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7620406lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0439858lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7620406pubmed:issue3lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7620406pubmed:dateCreated1995-8-31lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7620406pubmed:abstractTextAccurate noninvasive measurement of the volume of the liver has many potential clinical applications and is an important element in the preoperative evaluation of the liver transplant recipient. Helical (or spiral) computed tomography (CT) has theoretical advantages over conventional CT in this application because the entire liver can be imaged in a single breath-hold, limiting inaccuracies related to patient motion and respiratory variation.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7620406pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7620406pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7620406pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7620406pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7620406pubmed:issn0942-8925lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7620406pubmed:authorpubmed-author:StammEElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7620406pubmed:authorpubmed-author:TownsendRRlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7620406pubmed:authorpubmed-author:ThickmanDDlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7620406pubmed:authorpubmed-author:StapakisJJlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7620406pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7620406pubmed:volume20lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7620406pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7620406pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7620406pubmed:pagination209-10lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7620406pubmed:dateRevised2006-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7620406pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7620406-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7620406pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7620406-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7620406pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7620406-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7620406pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7620406-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7620406pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7620406-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7620406pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7620406-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7620406pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7620406-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7620406pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7620406-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7620406pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7620406-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7620406pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7620406-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7620406pubmed:articleTitleLiver volume assessment by conventional vs. helical CT.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7620406pubmed:affiliationDepartment of Radiology, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver 80262, USA.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7620406pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7620406pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed