Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:7600512rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7600512lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0007452lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7600512lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0279516lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7600512lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0018684lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7600512lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0597198lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7600512lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0205195lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7600512lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1272745lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7600512pubmed:issue4lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7600512pubmed:dateCreated1995-8-8lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7600512pubmed:abstractTextThe effectiveness of a feed-additive antimicrobial combination for improving feedlot performance and health was tested using 4325 high-risk feeder calves randomly allocated to a control group or an experimental group. The experimental group received the conventional ration plus a feed additive containing 700 mg per head/day of chlortetracycline and sulfamethazine from arrival at the feedlot to day 56 of the feeding period. The inclusion of the feed additive to the ration significantly improved average daily gain for days 0-28 (P = 0.0163) and 0-56 (P = 0.0001), and the feed conversion for days 0-28 (P = 0.0061) and 0-56 (P = 0.0004). Additionally, the use of the feed additive significantly reduced the rate of bovine respiratory disease morbidity for days 0-28 (P = 0.0014) and 0-56 (P = 0.0001), the rate of relapses and mortality for days 0-56 (P = 0.0151 and P = 0.0209, respectively), and the rate of animals diagnosed with chronic respiratory disease for days 0-28 and 0-56 (P = 0.0009 and P = 0.0002, respectively). Performance and health improvements produced by the use of the feed additive were cost-effective.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7600512pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7600512pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7600512pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7600512pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7600512pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7600512pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7600512pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7600512pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7600512pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7600512pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7600512pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7600512pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7600512pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7600512pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7600512pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7600512pubmed:monthAprlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7600512pubmed:issn0008-5286lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7600512pubmed:authorpubmed-author:COTER ARAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7600512pubmed:authorpubmed-author:GalliG PGPlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7600512pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7600512pubmed:volume36lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7600512pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7600512pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7600512pubmed:pagination223-9lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7600512pubmed:dateRevised2010-9-13lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7600512pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7600512-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7600512pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7600512-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7600512pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7600512-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7600512pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7600512-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7600512pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7600512-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7600512pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7600512-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7600512pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7600512-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7600512pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7600512-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7600512pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7600512-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7600512pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7600512-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7600512pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7600512-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7600512pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7600512-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7600512pubmed:year1995lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7600512pubmed:articleTitleEfficacy of a feed-additive antibacterial combination for improving feedlot cattle performance and health.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7600512pubmed:affiliationLangford/Cyanamid, Guelph, Ontario.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7600512pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7600512pubmed:publicationTypeClinical Triallld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7600512pubmed:publicationTypeControlled Clinical Triallld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:7600512lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:7600512lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:7600512lld:pubmed