Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:7526811rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7526811lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0920317lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7526811lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0032788lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7526811lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0677582lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7526811lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0814470lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7526811lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1708528lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7526811lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0445202lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7526811lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0355642lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7526811pubmed:issue6lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7526811pubmed:dateCreated1994-12-28lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7526811pubmed:abstractTextProphylactic drug treatment is one of several strategies to reduce postoperative blood loss and potentially limit homologous blood use in open heart surgery. A computerized MEDLINE search supplemented with manual bibliography reviews was performed for randomized clinical trials published in peer-reviewed English-language journals from January 1980 to June 1993. A metaanalysis was conducted of trials evaluating desmopressin (group DD, n = 13), epsilon-aminocaproic acid or tranexamic acid (group EA, n = 4), and aprotinin (group AP, n = 16). Eligible studies used placebo controls and administered the drug in a prophylactic manner. The primary study end point was postoperative chest tube loss (mL, mean +/- standard deviation). There was a significant reduction in postoperative chest tube loss detected for each of the active treatments versus the placebo (DD versus controls: percent reduction 0.11, p = 0.0021; EA versus controls: percent reduction 0.30, p < 0.0001; and AP versus controls: percent reduction 0.36, p < 0.0001). Therapy with EA or AP was associated with a greater reduction in chest tube loss than DD (EA versus DD, p = 0.0033, and AP versus DD, p < 0.0001). Secondary study end points were transfusion requirements, chest reexploration, and perioperative mortality. The volume of postoperative red cell transfusion (mean +/- standard deviation) was reduced with EA (p < 0.0001) or AP treatment (p < 0.0001) compared with a placebo or DD, whereas the proportion of patients given transfusions was limited only in the AP-treated patients (odds ratio 0.23; 95% confidence interval, 0.16 to 0.33; p < 0.0001).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7526811pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7526811pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7526811pubmed:citationSubsetAIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7526811pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7526811pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7526811pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7526811pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7526811pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7526811pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7526811pubmed:monthDeclld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7526811pubmed:issn0003-4975lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7526811pubmed:authorpubmed-author:LeaAAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7526811pubmed:authorpubmed-author:GoldmanB SBSlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7526811pubmed:authorpubmed-author:NaylorC DCDlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7526811pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MaiRRlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7526811pubmed:authorpubmed-author:FremesS ESElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7526811pubmed:authorpubmed-author:McLeanR FRFlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7526811pubmed:authorpubmed-author:WongB IBIlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7526811pubmed:authorpubmed-author:ChristakisG...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7526811pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7526811pubmed:volume58lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7526811pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7526811pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7526811pubmed:pagination1580-8lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7526811pubmed:dateRevised2006-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7526811pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7526811-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7526811pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7526811-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7526811pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7526811-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7526811pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7526811-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7526811pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7526811-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7526811pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7526811-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7526811pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7526811-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7526811pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7526811-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7526811pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7526811-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7526811pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7526811-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7526811pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7526811-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7526811pubmed:year1994lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7526811pubmed:articleTitleMetaanalysis of prophylactic drug treatment in the prevention of postoperative bleeding.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7526811pubmed:affiliationDepartment of Anaesthesia, Sunnybrook Health Science Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7526811pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7526811pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7526811pubmed:publicationTypeMeta-Analysislld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:7526811lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:7526811lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:7526811lld:pubmed