Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:752042rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:752042lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0001779lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:752042lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0025260lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:752042lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0600269lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:752042lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0441633lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:752042pubmed:issue4lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:752042pubmed:dateCreated1979-8-29lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:752042pubmed:abstractTextSixty-five healthy males (31 to 75 years old) memorized lists of six letters (familiar or unfamiliar organization). Letters were then presented singly, and subjects responded yes or no according to whether a given letter was in the memorized set. Subjects of all ages took longer to respond in the case of the unfamiliar list. This was disproportionately true for the oldest subjects, consistent with the idea that the age-related differences in the unfamiliar condition could not be wholly accounted for by psychomotor factors. The distributions of response latencies in the oldest groups had greater variance and skew.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:752042pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:752042pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:752042pubmed:citationSubsetAIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:752042pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:752042pubmed:monthJullld:pubmed
pubmed-article:752042pubmed:issn0022-1422lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:752042pubmed:authorpubmed-author:ThomasJ CJClld:pubmed
pubmed-article:752042pubmed:authorpubmed-author:FozardJ LJLlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:752042pubmed:authorpubmed-author:WaughN CNClld:pubmed
pubmed-article:752042pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:752042pubmed:volume33lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:752042pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:752042pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:752042pubmed:pagination528-33lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:752042pubmed:dateRevised2007-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:752042pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:752042-H...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:752042pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:752042-A...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:752042pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:752042-S...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:752042pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:752042-A...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:752042pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:752042-M...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:752042pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:752042-M...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:752042pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:752042-A...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:752042pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:752042-A...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:752042pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:752042-P...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:752042pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:752042-M...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:752042pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:752042-I...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:752042pubmed:year1978lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:752042pubmed:articleTitleAge and familiarity in memory scanning.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:752042pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:752042pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.lld:pubmed