Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:7498205rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7498205lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0155626lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7498205lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0679006lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7498205lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0205253lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7498205lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0302350lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7498205lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C2350391lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7498205lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0205421lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7498205lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0750491lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7498205pubmed:issue7lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7498205pubmed:dateCreated1996-1-17lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7498205pubmed:abstractTextEarly myocardial scintigraphic imaging has become technically feasible in patients admitted to hospital with suspected acute myocardial infarction. After prompt injection of 99mTc-sestamibi, subsequent scintigraphic imaging of perfused myocardium can be performed. During a 5-month period, 237 patients were admitted to the coronary care unit of a district hospital on suspicion of acute ischaemic syndrome, and injection of 99mTc-sestamibi for the performance of myocardial scintigraphy was carried out in 134 patients, on average 2 h after onset of symptoms. The investigation was repeated in 126 patients, on average 18 h after the injection. Three planar views were taken in the coronary care unit with a mobile gamma camera. The prevalence of acute myocardial infarction was 53%. The predictive value at the first scintigraphic imaging for a positive or negative test for myocardial infarction 54% and 56%, respectively. Even exclusion of patients with a previous infarction did not increase the diagnostic validity. The predictive value of a negative test, 77%, at the second scintigraphy was still insufficient to make immediate therapeutic decisions. Myocardial scintigraphy performed early, on suspicion of acute myocardial infarction, cannot therefore be used routinely as a diagnostic test prior to intervention in unselected patients because some 90% of this patient group have myocardial perfusion defects.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7498205pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7498205pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7498205pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7498205pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7498205pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7498205pubmed:monthJullld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7498205pubmed:issn0195-668Xlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7498205pubmed:authorpubmed-author:NielsenS LSLlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7498205pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MøllerJ TJTlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7498205pubmed:authorpubmed-author:JensenP FPFlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7498205pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SkagenKKlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7498205pubmed:authorpubmed-author:CarlsenJJlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7498205pubmed:authorpubmed-author:KjøllerEElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7498205pubmed:authorpubmed-author:KanstrupI LILlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7498205pubmed:authorpubmed-author:Hvid-Jacobsen...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7498205pubmed:authorpubmed-author:NielsenFFlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7498205pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7498205pubmed:volume16lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7498205pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7498205pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7498205pubmed:pagination909-13lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7498205pubmed:dateRevised2006-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7498205pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7498205-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7498205pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7498205-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7498205pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7498205-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7498205pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7498205-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7498205pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7498205-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7498205pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7498205-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7498205pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7498205-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7498205pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7498205-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7498205pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7498205-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7498205pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7498205-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7498205pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7498205-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7498205pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7498205-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7498205pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7498205-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7498205pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7498205-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7498205pubmed:year1995lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7498205pubmed:articleTitleImpact of immediate and delayed myocardial scintigraphy on therapeutic decisions in suspected acute myocardial infarction.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7498205pubmed:affiliationDepartment of Internal Medicine, Herlev Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7498205pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7498205pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tlld:pubmed