Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:7492065rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7492065lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0871311lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7492065pubmed:issue12lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7492065pubmed:dateCreated1996-1-4lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7492065pubmed:abstractTextThe usefulness of a monothermal warm caloric screening test (MWST) for predicting alternate binaural bithermal test abnormalities has been reexamined. Previously, researchers have reported false-negative rates for the MWST ranging from 0% to over 35%. Alternate binaural bithermal test data from 504 consecutive patients were evaluated with MWST failure criteria of 24.5% and 29%, with and without the addition of failure criteria from subtests of the electronystagmography examination. Sensitivity of the MWST alone was high, and improved with additional failure criteria. The specificity levels were correspondingly high. Results support the use of the MWST with adjunctive failure criteria when patients have otherwise normal electronystagmography findings.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7492065pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7492065pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7492065pubmed:citationSubsetAIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7492065pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7492065pubmed:monthDeclld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7492065pubmed:issn0003-4894lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7492065pubmed:authorpubmed-author:CalderJ AJAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7492065pubmed:authorpubmed-author:PrecOOlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7492065pubmed:authorpubmed-author:NewmanC WCWlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7492065pubmed:authorpubmed-author:JacobsonG PGPlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7492065pubmed:authorpubmed-author:ShepherdV AVAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7492065pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7492065pubmed:volume104lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7492065pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7492065pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7492065pubmed:pagination942-5lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7492065pubmed:dateRevised2006-5-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7492065pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7492065-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7492065pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7492065-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7492065pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7492065-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7492065pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7492065-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7492065pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7492065-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7492065pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7492065-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7492065pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7492065-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7492065pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7492065-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7492065pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7492065-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7492065pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7492065-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7492065pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7492065-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7492065pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7492065-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7492065pubmed:year1995lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7492065pubmed:articleTitleReappraisal of the monothermal warm caloric screening test.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7492065pubmed:affiliationDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI 48202, USA.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7492065pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed