| pubmed-article:7491420 | rdf:type | pubmed:Citation | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:7491420 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0024198 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:7491420 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0022864 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:7491420 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0011900 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:7491420 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0022885 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:7491420 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0392366 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:7491420 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C1707455 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:7491420 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0014441 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:7491420 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0205473 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:7491420 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C1875307 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:7491420 | pubmed:issue | 3 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:7491420 | pubmed:dateCreated | 1996-1-4 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:7491420 | pubmed:abstractText | The purpose of this work was to evaluate detection of antibodies IgM and IgG against B. burgdorferi. We examined presence of IgM in 96 serum samples from patients suspected of Lyme disease. We looked for IgG in serum samples of 48 forest workers who submitted frequent tick bites in last two years. Among 96 patients whose sera were examined we had positive results in both tests in 5 cases and in 25 cases positive results were achieved only in test II. In 48 serum samples which we examined for presence of IgG in 2 cases positive results were in both tests, in 1 case positive in test II and negative in test I in 3 cases positive result in test I and negative in test II. According to these results we drew following initial conclusions: 1) obtained results testify better sensitivity and specificity of test II which consists of recombinant antigens of Borrelia burgdorferi, 2) no essential difference was shown in detection IgG among two used tests. | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:7491420 | pubmed:language | pol | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:7491420 | pubmed:journal | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:7491420 | pubmed:citationSubset | IM | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:7491420 | pubmed:chemical | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:7491420 | pubmed:chemical | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:7491420 | pubmed:status | MEDLINE | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:7491420 | pubmed:issn | 0033-2100 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:7491420 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:Hermanowska-S... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:7491420 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:DanilukJJ | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:7491420 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:KondrusikMM | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:7491420 | pubmed:issnType | Print | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:7491420 | pubmed:volume | 49 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:7491420 | pubmed:owner | NLM | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:7491420 | pubmed:authorsComplete | Y | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:7491420 | pubmed:pagination | 257-60 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:7491420 | pubmed:dateRevised | 2006-11-15 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:7491420 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:7491420-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:7491420 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:7491420-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:7491420 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:7491420-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:7491420 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:7491420-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:7491420 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:7491420-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:7491420 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:7491420-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:7491420 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:7491420-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:7491420 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:7491420-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:7491420 | pubmed:year | 1995 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:7491420 | pubmed:articleTitle | [A comparison of serologic ELISA tests from BIOMEDICA Ges. M.B.H. and VIRO-Immun Labor Diagnostica GMBH in the diagnosis of Lyme disease (introduction)]. | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:7491420 | pubmed:affiliation | Klinika Chorób Pasozytniczych i Neuroinfekcji Akademii Medycznej w Bia?ymstoku. | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:7491420 | pubmed:publicationType | Journal Article | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:7491420 | pubmed:publicationType | Comparative Study | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:7491420 | pubmed:publicationType | English Abstract | lld:pubmed |
