Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:7460800rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7460800lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0021289lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7460800lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0021270lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7460800lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1707455lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7460800lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0034980lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7460800pubmed:issue4lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7460800pubmed:dateCreated1981-4-24lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7460800pubmed:abstractTextIndex and regression methods of selecting babies whose heads are out of proportion to their body weight are examined and compared. The ratios head circumference3/birthweight and head circumference3/birthweightP (where P is a power found by regression methods) are used, and the regression of head circumference 3 on birthweight is calculated. The problems associated with all three methods are discussed, and the power index is found to be the most satisfactory method.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7460800pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7460800pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7460800pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7460800pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7460800pubmed:monthDeclld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7460800pubmed:issn0378-3782lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7460800pubmed:authorpubmed-author:OunstedMMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7460800pubmed:authorpubmed-author:ScottAAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7460800pubmed:authorpubmed-author:GoodFFlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7460800pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7460800pubmed:volume4lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7460800pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7460800pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7460800pubmed:pagination347-55lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7460800pubmed:dateRevised2007-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7460800pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7460800-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7460800pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7460800-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7460800pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7460800-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7460800pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7460800-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7460800pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7460800-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7460800pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7460800-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7460800pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7460800-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7460800pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7460800-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7460800pubmed:year1980lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7460800pubmed:articleTitleA comparison of ration and regression methods for assessing the proportionality of newborn babies.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7460800pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7460800pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7460800pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tlld:pubmed