Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:7400192rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7400192lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0016658lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7400192lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0011447lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7400192pubmed:issue4lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7400192pubmed:dateCreated1980-10-21lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7400192pubmed:abstractTextTwo types of fracture toughness specimen, the tapered cleavage (TC) and single edge notch (SEN), are compared. Their reproducibility, accuracy, and ease of preparation are investigated. The fracture toughness of four types of acrylic resin, heat cured, autopolymerized, injection molded, and high impact resistant, has been determined by one or both of the above methods. High impact acrylic proved too ductile for either of the specimens to be used to assesss K1c; however, these deviations from brittle behavior were revealed by the tests and some insight into impact resistance was gained. The SEN specimens proved capable of distinguishing between the fracture toughness characteristics of the four types of denture base acrylics and proved easy to fabricate. The TC specimens proved difficult to fabricate requiring specialized equipment; however, once made, the specimens revealed more of the fracture process than did the SEN specimens.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7400192pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7400192pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7400192pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7400192pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7400192pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7400192pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7400192pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7400192pubmed:monthJullld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7400192pubmed:issn0021-9304lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7400192pubmed:authorpubmed-author:StaffordG DGDlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7400192pubmed:authorpubmed-author:HuggettRRlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7400192pubmed:authorpubmed-author:CaustonB EBElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7400192pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7400192pubmed:volume14lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7400192pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7400192pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7400192pubmed:pagination359-71lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7400192pubmed:dateRevised2006-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7400192pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7400192-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7400192pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7400192-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7400192pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7400192-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7400192pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7400192-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7400192pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7400192-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7400192pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7400192-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7400192pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7400192-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7400192pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7400192-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7400192pubmed:year1980lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7400192pubmed:articleTitleFracture toughness of denture base acrylics.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7400192pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7400192pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed