Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:7397078rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7397078lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0242485lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7397078lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0552399lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7397078lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1301820lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7397078lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1710020lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7397078lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1514863lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7397078pubmed:issue6lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7397078pubmed:dateCreated1980-10-27lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7397078pubmed:abstractTextIn 80 patients, multiple measurements of the fetal biparietal diameter were made during one examination using a real-time scanner equipped with a coded cephalometer. From the sets of data, the means and standard deviations for the group of 80 patients were calculated. In 80 per cent of cases, the individual standard deviations of the results were less than or equal to the estimated standard deviation of the group as a whole. The variability of measurement related to biparietal diameter was least in the range 59 to 83 mm. Comparison of the results obtained with the coded device and others obtained 'blind' does not reveal any significant advantage for the coded device.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7397078pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7397078pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7397078pubmed:citationSubsetAIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7397078pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7397078pubmed:monthJunlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7397078pubmed:issn0306-5456lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7397078pubmed:authorpubmed-author:OsinusiB OBOlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7397078pubmed:authorpubmed-author:HallA JAJlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7397078pubmed:authorpubmed-author:FlemingJ EJElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7397078pubmed:authorpubmed-author:AdamA HAHlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7397078pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7397078pubmed:volume87lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7397078pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7397078pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7397078pubmed:pagination467-70lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7397078pubmed:dateRevised2004-11-17lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7397078pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7397078-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7397078pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7397078-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7397078pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7397078-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7397078pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7397078-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7397078pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7397078-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7397078pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7397078-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7397078pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7397078-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7397078pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7397078-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7397078pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7397078-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7397078pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7397078-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7397078pubmed:year1980lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7397078pubmed:articleTitleReproducibility of biparietal diameter measurements obtained with a real-time scanner.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7397078pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed