Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:7227677rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7227677lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0028263lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7227677lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1704632lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7227677lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0871261lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7227677lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C2911692lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7227677lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1706817lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7227677lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1707433lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7227677lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0449450lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7227677lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C2827666lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7227677pubmed:issue2lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7227677pubmed:dateCreated1981-7-9lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7227677pubmed:abstractTextTwo studies were conducted wherein college students with normal hearing sensitivity listened to CID W-22 recordings (Technisonics Studios) mixed with white noise. Four-word discrimination scores were obtained from each listener. In one study, a speech-to-noise ratio of approximately +1 dB was used whereas +7 dB was used in the other. Large standard deviations and low correlations indicate that the use of background noise with this clinical word discrimination test is associated with a relatively large amount of response variability and unreliability. These results suggest that the performance score obtained from a single list of CID W-22 presented in noise may not be a reliable indicator of a listener's true discrimination ability and therefore clinical interpretation of a listener's performance should be made with caution.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7227677pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7227677pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7227677pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7227677pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7227677pubmed:issn0196-0202lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7227677pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MillerLLlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7227677pubmed:authorpubmed-author:RosenthalEElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7227677pubmed:authorpubmed-author:GengelR WRWlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7227677pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7227677pubmed:volume2lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7227677pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7227677pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7227677pubmed:pagination78-81lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7227677pubmed:dateRevised2007-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7227677pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7227677-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7227677pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7227677-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7227677pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7227677-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7227677pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7227677-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7227677pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7227677-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7227677pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7227677-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7227677pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7227677-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7227677pubmed:articleTitleBetween and within listener variability in response to CID W-22 presented in noise.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7227677pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed