Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:6824393rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6824393lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0040405lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:6824393lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0000726lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:6824393lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1707455lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:6824393lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C2603343lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:6824393pubmed:issue2lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6824393pubmed:dateCreated1983-3-11lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6824393pubmed:abstractTextWe reviewed the indications for 210 consecutive abdominal computed tomography (CT) scans. One-hundred sixty-six CT scans were done in a goal-directed fashion, whereas 44 were non-goal-directed as part of the evaluation of non-specific abdominal pain, fever, or weight loss. Forty-three percent of CT scans done in a goal-directed fashion revealed new significant information as opposed to only 2% of non-goal-directed studies. Sixteen percent of goal-directed CT scans were normal as opposed to 41% of non-goal-directed CT scans. In at least 16% of cases, abdominal CT scans revealed data confirmatory of information obtained by other modalities. We conclude that abdominal CT scanning used in a non-goal-directed fashion is rarely helpful; however, goal-directed scanning often yields important information.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6824393pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6824393pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6824393pubmed:citationSubsetAIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6824393pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6824393pubmed:monthFeblld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6824393pubmed:issn0003-9926lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6824393pubmed:authorpubmed-author:KarpfMMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6824393pubmed:authorpubmed-author:HerbertDDlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6824393pubmed:authorpubmed-author:HemmerKKlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6824393pubmed:authorpubmed-author:KapoorWWlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6824393pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6824393pubmed:volume143lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6824393pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6824393pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6824393pubmed:pagination249-51lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6824393pubmed:dateRevised2004-11-17lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6824393pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:6824393-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6824393pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:6824393-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6824393pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:6824393-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6824393pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:6824393-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6824393pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:6824393-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6824393pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:6824393-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6824393pubmed:year1983lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6824393pubmed:articleTitleAbdominal computed tomography. Comparison of the usefulness of goal-directed v non-goal-directed studies.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6824393pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed