Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:6625135rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6625135lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0030193lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:6625135lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0003467lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:6625135lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1707455lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:6625135lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0441800lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:6625135lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0919553lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:6625135lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0175659lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:6625135lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0243071lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:6625135lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0205132lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:6625135lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0349674lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:6625135lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0222045lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:6625135pubmed:issue9lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6625135pubmed:dateCreated1983-11-23lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6625135pubmed:abstractTextComparison of a linear analogue scale on paper and a computerised audiovisual analogue scale presented on a visual display unit is described. Pain was assessed postoperatively in 109 patients and anxiety pre-operatively in 146 patients. Results show a strong correlation between gradings obtained using the two methods, indicating the computerised method is as reliable as the conventional one.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6625135pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6625135pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6625135pubmed:citationSubsetAIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6625135pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6625135pubmed:monthSeplld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6625135pubmed:issn0003-2409lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6625135pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BeattyPPlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6625135pubmed:authorpubmed-author:KayBBlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6625135pubmed:authorpubmed-author:HealyT ETElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6625135pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BhachuH SHSlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6625135pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6625135pubmed:volume38lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6625135pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6625135pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6625135pubmed:pagination875-8lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6625135pubmed:dateRevised2006-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6625135pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:6625135-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6625135pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:6625135-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6625135pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:6625135-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6625135pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:6625135-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6625135pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:6625135-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6625135pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:6625135-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6625135pubmed:year1983lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6625135pubmed:articleTitleGrading of pain and anxiety. Comparison between a linear analogue and a computerised audiovisual analogue scale.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6625135pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6625135pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:6625135lld:pubmed