Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:6542725rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6542725lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0030657lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:6542725lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1280551lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:6542725lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0042196lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:6542725lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0449444lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:6542725lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0162313lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:6542725pubmed:issue3-4lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6542725pubmed:dateCreated1985-1-31lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6542725pubmed:abstractTextInfectivity of A. caninum in dogs inoculated with 500 larvae by different routes (percutaneous, subcutaneous, intravenous, per os, through a stomach tube and foot pad) was studied by ascertaining the worm burden at necropsy 21-27 days post-infection. Infection through foot-pads yielded the maximum number of worms. The percentage of worm establishment using foot-pad inoculation was 73.8%, followed by subcutaneous (49.0%), percutaneous (45.0%) and per os (35.0%) routes. These results show that active penetration of the larvae through skin and particularly foot-pad is the most favourable mode of infection of dogs.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6542725pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6542725pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6542725pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6542725pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6542725pubmed:monthNovlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6542725pubmed:issn0304-4017lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6542725pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SinhaP KPKlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6542725pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MittraSSlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6542725pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SasmalN KNKlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6542725pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6542725pubmed:volume16lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6542725pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6542725pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6542725pubmed:pagination289-93lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6542725pubmed:dateRevised2006-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6542725pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:6542725-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6542725pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:6542725-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6542725pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:6542725-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6542725pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:6542725-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6542725pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:6542725-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6542725pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:6542725-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6542725pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:6542725-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6542725pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:6542725-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6542725pubmed:year1984lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6542725pubmed:articleTitleInfectivity of Ancylostoma caninum in dogs by different routes of inoculation.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6542725pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6542725pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6542725pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tlld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:6542725lld:pubmed