Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:6525822rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6525822lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0028013lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:6525822lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1442989lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:6525822lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0030646lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:6525822lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0185125lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:6525822pubmed:issue5lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6525822pubmed:dateCreated1985-3-27lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6525822pubmed:abstractTextThe concentration of nickel sulphate was determined in 9-16 mg test samples from commercially available patch test antigens. With two different manufacturers of 2.5% nickel sulphate in pet, the concentration range of 25 samples was 0.7 and 1.1% (+/- 2 SD) respectively, and with one manufacturer of 5.0% nickel sulphate in pet, the range was +/- 0.5%. In a normal patch test, the volume of patch test material applied with the Finn chamber technique should be 12-18 microliter (9-16 mg), but has been found to range between 9 and 50 microliter. Thus the amount of nickel applied in standard patch tests varies within at least 6-fold limits.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6525822pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6525822pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6525822pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6525822pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6525822pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6525822pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6525822pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6525822pubmed:monthNovlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6525822pubmed:issn0105-1873lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6525822pubmed:authorpubmed-author:FischerTTlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6525822pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MaibachHHlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6525822pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6525822pubmed:volume11lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6525822pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6525822pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6525822pubmed:pagination285-7lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6525822pubmed:dateRevised2004-11-17lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6525822pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:6525822-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6525822pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:6525822-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6525822pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:6525822-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6525822pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:6525822-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6525822pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:6525822-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6525822pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:6525822-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6525822pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:6525822-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6525822pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:6525822-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6525822pubmed:year1984lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6525822pubmed:articleTitleAmount of nickel applied with a standard patch test.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6525822pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:6525822lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:6525822lld:pubmed