Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:6524100rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6524100lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0021311lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:6524100lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0025663lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:6524100lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0007806lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:6524100lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0199176lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:6524100lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0542331lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:6524100lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1707455lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:6524100lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1442858lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:6524100pubmed:dateCreated1985-3-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6524100pubmed:abstractTextIn a series of 68 operations for insertion or revision of cerebrospinal fluid shunts the incidence of infection was reduced from 20% in controls to 4.2% when systemic and intrathecal or intra-shunt gentamicin prophylaxis was employed. The only infection occurring in the latter group was due to an organism resistant to gentamicin. No reduction in infection rate was noted when povidone iodine was instilled into the wounds.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6524100pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6524100pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6524100pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6524100pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6524100pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6524100pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6524100pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6524100pubmed:monthDeclld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6524100pubmed:issn0174-3082lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6524100pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MacKinnonA...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6524100pubmed:authorpubmed-author:LambertMMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6524100pubmed:authorpubmed-author:VaishnavAAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6524100pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6524100pubmed:volume39 Suppl 2lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6524100pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6524100pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6524100pubmed:pagination109-10lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6524100pubmed:dateRevised2006-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6524100pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:6524100-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6524100pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:6524100-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6524100pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:6524100-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6524100pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:6524100-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6524100pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:6524100-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6524100pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:6524100-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6524100pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:6524100-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6524100pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:6524100-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6524100pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:6524100-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6524100pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:6524100-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6524100pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:6524100-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6524100pubmed:year1984lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6524100pubmed:articleTitleComparison of two methods of prophylaxis against CSF shunt infection.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6524100pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6524100pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed