Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:6495015rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6495015lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0679727lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:6495015lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0221775lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:6495015lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0032893lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:6495015lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1515089lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:6495015lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0010341lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:6495015pubmed:issue5lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6495015pubmed:dateCreated1984-12-19lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6495015pubmed:abstractTextThe magnitude of the lumbar disc problem is reviewed and a profile of medical and surgical therapeutic expectations is presented. A study of a 5-year epoch of a neurosurgical practice indicated that 64% of all patients requiring disc surgery had satisfactory results and 12% were frank failures. The younger patients with single level disc rupture had the best results, and 18% of all patients required further surgery for recurrent disc problems. The complication rate was 4%. The bias of compensation invalidates any critique of a therapy mode and creates a tremendous economic impact. The need for improvement in the surgical management of lumbar disc disease is established.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6495015pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6495015pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6495015pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6495015pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6495015pubmed:issn0362-2436lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6495015pubmed:authorpubmed-author:RishB LBLlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6495015pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6495015pubmed:volume9lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6495015pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6495015pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6495015pubmed:pagination500-4lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6495015pubmed:dateRevised2011-11-17lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6495015pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:6495015-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6495015pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:6495015-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6495015pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:6495015-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6495015pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:6495015-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6495015pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:6495015-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6495015pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:6495015-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6495015pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:6495015-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6495015pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:6495015-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6495015pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:6495015-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6495015pubmed:articleTitleA critique of the surgical management of lumbar disc disease in a private neurosurgical practice.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6495015pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:6495015lld:pubmed