Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:6407322rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6407322lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0026035lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:6407322lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0392251lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:6407322pubmed:issue4lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6407322pubmed:dateCreated1983-7-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6407322pubmed:abstractTextThirty New Zealand White female rabbits underwent tubal resection and reanastomosis for comparison of conventional microsurgery and laser microsurgical techniques. The rabbits were divided into three groups. The first group of 10 rabbits had 3 cm of tissue resected by knife from each uterine horn; the cut ends were then reanastomosed in one layer with 8-0 Vicryl sutures with the use of the operating microscope. The second group of 10 rabbits had 3 cm of tissue resected by laser from each uterine horn; the cut ends were then reanastomosed in one layer with 8-0 Vicryl. The third group of 10 rabbits had 3 cm of tissue resected by laser from each uterine horn; the cut ends were then reanastomosed by "welding" the tissues with the laser. All rabbits in the first group became pregnant. Only four in the second group became pregnant, but none in the third group became pregnant. It is concluded that the carbon dioxide laser beam as used in this study has no place in tubal resection and reconstruction.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6407322pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6407322pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6407322pubmed:citationSubsetAIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6407322pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6407322pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6407322pubmed:monthJunlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6407322pubmed:issn0002-9378lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6407322pubmed:authorpubmed-author:FayezJ AJAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6407322pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MartinD KDKlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6407322pubmed:authorpubmed-author:JobsonV WVWlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6407322pubmed:authorpubmed-author:LentzS SSSlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6407322pubmed:authorpubmed-author:PayneD GDGlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6407322pubmed:authorpubmed-author:WestraD FDFlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6407322pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6407322pubmed:day15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6407322pubmed:volume146lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6407322pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6407322pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6407322pubmed:pagination371-3lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6407322pubmed:dateRevised2007-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6407322pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:6407322-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6407322pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:6407322-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6407322pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:6407322-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6407322pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:6407322-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6407322pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:6407322-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6407322pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:6407322-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6407322pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:6407322-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6407322pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:6407322-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6407322pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:6407322-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6407322pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:6407322-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6407322pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:6407322-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6407322pubmed:year1983lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6407322pubmed:articleTitleTubal microsurgery with the carbon dioxide laser.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6407322pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6407322pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed