Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:6344602rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6344602lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1527169lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:6344602lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0013018lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:6344602lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0035647lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:6344602lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0022646lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:6344602lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0449295lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:6344602lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0002979lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:6344602pubmed:issue1lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6344602pubmed:dateCreated1983-7-29lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6344602pubmed:abstractTextSix potential renal donors were evaluated by both conventional and digital subtraction angiography to determine the number of renal arteries to each kidney. The digital examination missed an accessory renal artery in one of six patients for an error rate of 17%.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6344602pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6344602pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6344602pubmed:citationSubsetAIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6344602pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6344602pubmed:monthJullld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6344602pubmed:issn0361-803Xlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6344602pubmed:authorpubmed-author:YuneH YHYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6344602pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SmithE JEJlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6344602pubmed:authorpubmed-author:LeapmanS BSBlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6344602pubmed:authorpubmed-author:KlatteE CEClld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6344602pubmed:authorpubmed-author:GALEH HHHlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6344602pubmed:authorpubmed-author:RabeF EFElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6344602pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6344602pubmed:volume141lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6344602pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6344602pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6344602pubmed:pagination91-3lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6344602pubmed:dateRevised2008-2-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6344602pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:6344602-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6344602pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:6344602-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6344602pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:6344602-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6344602pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:6344602-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6344602pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:6344602-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6344602pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:6344602-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6344602pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:6344602-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6344602pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:6344602-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6344602pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:6344602-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6344602pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:6344602-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6344602pubmed:year1983lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6344602pubmed:articleTitleLimitations of digital subtraction angiography in evaluating potential renal donors.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6344602pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed