Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:6177654rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6177654lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0025663lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:6177654lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0042036lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:6177654lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0085590lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:6177654lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0242485lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:6177654lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1609982lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:6177654lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0220934lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:6177654pubmed:issue4lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6177654pubmed:dateCreated1982-8-7lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6177654pubmed:abstractTextResidual urine was measured with the two-dimensional and the gray-scale equipments (Kretz-Technik) in 26 cases each. The results were checked by catheterization. The difference between the ultrasonographic and the catheter values was 20 to 40 ml for the two-dimensional, but only 5 to 10 ml for the gray-scale apparatus. Ultrasonography is regarded as a reliable and entirely harmless procedure, suited for the measurement of residual urine.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6177654pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6177654pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6177654pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6177654pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6177654pubmed:issn0301-1623lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6177654pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BaloghFFlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6177654pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SzabóVVlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6177654pubmed:authorpubmed-author:PajotNNlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6177654pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SóbelMMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6177654pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6177654pubmed:volume13lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6177654pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6177654pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6177654pubmed:pagination345-51lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6177654pubmed:dateRevised2006-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6177654pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:6177654-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6177654pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:6177654-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6177654pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:6177654-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6177654pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:6177654-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6177654pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:6177654-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6177654pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:6177654-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6177654pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:6177654-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6177654pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:6177654-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6177654pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:6177654-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6177654pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:6177654-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6177654pubmed:year1981lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6177654pubmed:articleTitleUltrasonic measurement of residual urine: a method requiring no catheter.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6177654pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6177654pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed