Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:3970764rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3970764lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0013778lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:3970764lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1704419lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:3970764pubmed:issue2lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3970764pubmed:dateCreated1985-4-24lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3970764pubmed:abstractTextDuring cardiopulmonary bypass, 150 cardiac surgical patients were prospectively evaluated for the number, energy, current, and success rates of direct current (DC) shocks required to terminate reperfusion ventricular fibrillation (1 degree) or ventricular fibrillation occurring subsequent to a nonfibrillatory reperfusion rhythm (2 degrees). Thirty-one percent of 1-J shocks and 58% of 2.5-J shocks defibrillated. Above 2.5 J, the defibrillation success rate reached a plateau of 50-60%. Myocardial resistance decreased significantly after the first shock but remained stable during subsequent shocks. Lower defibrillating currents and myocardial resistances than had been previously reported were observed. The feasibility of low-energy defibrillation during cardiopulmonary bypass was therefore documented.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3970764pubmed:granthttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3970764pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3970764pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3970764pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3970764pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3970764pubmed:monthMarlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3970764pubmed:issn0735-6757lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3970764pubmed:authorpubmed-author:NolanS PSPlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3970764pubmed:authorpubmed-author:WellonsH AHAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3970764pubmed:authorpubmed-author:CrosbyI KIKlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3970764pubmed:authorpubmed-author:LakeC LCLlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3970764pubmed:authorpubmed-author:CramptonR SRSlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3970764pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SellersT DTDlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3970764pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3970764pubmed:volume3lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3970764pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3970764pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3970764pubmed:pagination104-7lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3970764pubmed:dateRevised2007-11-14lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3970764pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3970764-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3970764pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3970764-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3970764pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3970764-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3970764pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3970764-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3970764pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3970764-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3970764pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3970764-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3970764pubmed:year1985lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3970764pubmed:articleTitleLow-energy defibrillation: safe and effective.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3970764pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3970764pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3970764pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tlld:pubmed