Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:3928265rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3928265lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0003232lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:3928265lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0007561lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:3928265lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0279516lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:3928265lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0441655lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:3928265lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1707455lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:3928265lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1533691lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:3928265pubmed:issue7lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3928265pubmed:dateCreated1985-10-3lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3928265pubmed:abstractTextThe results of a large three centre co-ordinated study into the in vitro susceptibility of bacterial clinical pathogens showed no significant evidence of regional variation within the U.K. towards the 10 antibiotics examined. The newer cephalosporins were highly potent and superior to other antibiotics against the Enterobacteriaceae, with ceftriaxone and cefotaxime the most potent. Against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, gentamicin was the most active, followed by ceftazidime, piperacillin and ceftriaxone; cefotetan was the least active. Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus albus were most susceptible to cefuroxime and gentamicin, though most were also susceptible to ceftriaxone, cefotaxime and cefoxitin. Streptococcus (Groups A and B), Streptococcus pneumoniae and Neisseria spp. were susceptible to most agents other than gentamicin, but ceftriaxone and cefotaxime were overall the most potent. Ceftriaxone was the most active agent against Haemophilus influenzae. The newer agents were variable and relatively poor against anaerobes and only amoxycillin and piperacillin were significantly active against Streptococcus faecalis. The overall resistance level to the third generation cephalosporins was low.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3928265pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3928265pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3928265pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3928265pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3928265pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3928265pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3928265pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3928265pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3928265pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3928265pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3928265pubmed:issn0300-7995lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3928265pubmed:authorpubmed-author:ReevesD SDSlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3928265pubmed:authorpubmed-author:HoltH AHAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3928265pubmed:authorpubmed-author:WiseRRlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3928265pubmed:authorpubmed-author:HallM JMJlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3928265pubmed:authorpubmed-author:EmmersonA MAMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3928265pubmed:authorpubmed-author:AndrewsJJlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3928265pubmed:authorpubmed-author:LamportP APAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3928265pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BywaterM JMJlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3928265pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3928265pubmed:volume9lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3928265pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3928265pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3928265pubmed:pagination480-93lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3928265pubmed:dateRevised2006-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3928265pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3928265-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3928265pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3928265-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3928265pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3928265-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3928265pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3928265-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3928265pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3928265-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3928265pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3928265-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3928265pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3928265-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3928265pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3928265-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3928265pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3928265-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3928265pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3928265-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3928265pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3928265-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3928265pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3928265-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3928265pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3928265-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3928265pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3928265-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3928265pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3928265-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3928265pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3928265-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3928265pubmed:year1985lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3928265pubmed:articleTitleThe in vitro antibacterial activity of ceftriaxone in comparison with nine other antibiotics.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3928265pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3928265pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:3928265lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:3928265lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:3928265lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:3928265lld:pubmed