| pubmed-article:3918449 | pubmed:abstractText | A low-dose "nonsuperovulation" scheme of ovulation induction (schedule 1: 15 treatment cycles in 13 women) was compared to a high-dose, individually adjusted "controlled-superovulation" scheme of human menopausal gonadotropin administration (schedule 2: 18 treatment cycles in 17 women, with four women also having been treated under schedule 1). In schedule 2 more human menopausal gonadotropin was employed, 17 beta-estradiol plasma levels were higher, and more ova were retrieved per treatment cycle (p less than 0.01) with a higher rate of mature ova (p = 0.001). Also, under this schedule all treatment cycles resulted in successful retrieval of ova, whereas under schedule 1, four cycles (27%) were abandoned before laparoscopy because the follicles had ovulated (p = 0.03). Furthermore, the proportion of embryos cleaving to the two- to four-cell stage were higher under schedule 2 (38 of 53, or 72%) as compared to schedule 1 (13 of 25, or 52%), but this was not statistically significant (p = 0.07). Two pregnancies were conceived under schedule 2 giving a rate of 11% per treatment cycle. It was concluded that schedule 2, the individually adjusted controlled-superovulation scheme of human menopausal gonadotropin administration, was the superior technique of ovulation induction in an in vitro fertilization program. | lld:pubmed |
