Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:3871289rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3871289lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0040405lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:3871289lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0024091lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:3871289lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0944157lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:3871289lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0242485lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:3871289lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0012751lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:3871289pubmed:issue2lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3871289pubmed:dateCreated1985-2-14lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3871289pubmed:abstractTextLumbar spine computed tomographic (CT) scans of 10 patients were examined independently at two levels by five experienced radiologists. At each level the minimum midline sagittal diameter was measured, and at each intervertebral space the left foramen was measured for its minimum diameter. Statistically significant differences were found between the measurements of different observers, differences that in a number of cases could have led to disagreement over whether or not stenosis was present. There were reasonably strong correlations between different observers' readings of midline sagittal diameters but generally not of foraminal diameters. Reasons for discrepancies between observers in spine CT measurements are reviewed briefly.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3871289pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3871289pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3871289pubmed:citationSubsetAIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3871289pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3871289pubmed:monthFeblld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3871289pubmed:issn0361-803Xlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3871289pubmed:authorpubmed-author:CarterA PAPlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3871289pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BeersG JGJlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3871289pubmed:authorpubmed-author:ShahR RRRlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3871289pubmed:authorpubmed-author:TilakS PSPlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3871289pubmed:authorpubmed-author:LeiterB EBElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3871289pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3871289pubmed:volume144lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3871289pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3871289pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3871289pubmed:pagination395-8lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3871289pubmed:dateRevised2011-11-17lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3871289pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3871289-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3871289pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3871289-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3871289pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3871289-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3871289pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3871289-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3871289pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3871289-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3871289pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3871289-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3871289pubmed:year1985lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3871289pubmed:articleTitleInterobserver discrepancies in distance measurements from lumbar spine CT scans.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3871289pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed