Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:3789507rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3789507lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0035647lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:3789507lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1280551lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:3789507pubmed:issue11lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3789507pubmed:dateCreated1987-1-13lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3789507pubmed:abstractTextBrain stem and cerebrocortical potentials were evoked by electrical stimulation of the infraorbital nerve of dogs and recorded through needle electrodes placed adjacent to the contralateral parietal bone. Five individual, short latency peaks were recorded in each averaged trigeminal nerve-evoked potential and were identified as I, II (A and B), III (A and B), PI (A, B, and C), and NI. Mean peak latencies +/- 1 SD were as follows: I = 0.9 +/- 0.1 ms, IIA = 1.7 +/- 0.1 ms, IIB = 2.5 +/- 0.1 ms, IIIA = 3.6 +/- 0.15 ms, IIIB = 4.1 +/- 0.2 ms, PIA = 5.2 +/- 0.15 ms, PIB = 6.4 +/- 0.2 ms, PIC = 7.3 +/- 0.3 ms, and NI = 11.0 +/- 0.6 ms. Trigeminal nerve-evoked potentials recorded through needle electrodes were essentially the same as potentials evoked by direct stimulation of the infraorbital nerve and recorded directly from the dura mater overlying the contralateral rostral suprasylvian gyrus. The specificity of the stimulating site was verified by recording before and after the infraorbital nerve was cut proximal to the stimulating site.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3789507pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3789507pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3789507pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3789507pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3789507pubmed:monthNovlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3789507pubmed:issn0002-9645lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3789507pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SpurgeonT LTLlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3789507pubmed:authorpubmed-author:WhalenL RLRlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3789507pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3789507pubmed:volume47lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3789507pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3789507pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3789507pubmed:pagination2435-40lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3789507pubmed:dateRevised2006-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3789507pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3789507-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3789507pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3789507-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3789507pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3789507-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3789507pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3789507-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3789507pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3789507-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3789507pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3789507-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3789507pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3789507-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3789507pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3789507-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3789507pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3789507-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3789507pubmed:year1986lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3789507pubmed:articleTitleTrigeminal nerve-evoked potentials in the dog.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3789507pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3789507pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed