Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:3591256rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3591256lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1707455lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:3591256lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0348000lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:3591256lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0175673lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:3591256pubmed:issue4lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3591256pubmed:dateCreated1987-7-9lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3591256pubmed:abstractTextAs part of a training programme for younger doctors, two commercially available, emergency cricothyroidotomy sets were evaluated. Prior to the surgical procedure, half of the doctors in each group received an audiovisual lesson. In a simulated but realistic emergency situation, involving autopsy material, cricothyroidotomy was performed utilizing either the "Nutrake" or the "Gentofte" system. The audiovisual lesson increased the speed and the success rate of the doctors performing this procedure as well as strengthening their confidence. Both systems allowed positive pressure ventilation. The participating doctors achieved a higher success rate at a faster speed with the "Nutrake" set.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3591256pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3591256pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3591256pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3591256pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3591256pubmed:monthMaylld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3591256pubmed:issn0001-5172lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3591256pubmed:authorpubmed-author:WernerMMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3591256pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BackUUlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3591256pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MøllerJ TJTlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3591256pubmed:authorpubmed-author:NielsenH KHKlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3591256pubmed:authorpubmed-author:LybeckerHHlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3591256pubmed:authorpubmed-author:RavloOOlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3591256pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3591256pubmed:volume31lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3591256pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3591256pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3591256pubmed:pagination317-9lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3591256pubmed:dateRevised2006-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3591256pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3591256-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3591256pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3591256-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3591256pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3591256-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3591256pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3591256-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3591256pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3591256-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3591256pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3591256-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3591256pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3591256-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3591256pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3591256-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3591256pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3591256-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3591256pubmed:year1987lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3591256pubmed:articleTitleA comparison between two emergency cricothyroidotomy instruments.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3591256pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3591256pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed