Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:3540465rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3540465lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0025664lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:3540465lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0178566lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:3540465lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0027817lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:3540465lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0023732lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:3540465lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1546466lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:3540465pubmed:issue1-2lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3540465pubmed:dateCreated1987-2-19lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3540465pubmed:abstractTextBivariate linear models, used to describe morphological and functional characteristics between two sets of observations, are examined both in concept and in application. This paper focuses on the underlying assumptions and statistics of the method most frequently used: ordinary linear regression, principal axis and standard major axis. It is shown how the choice of method should depend on: the purpose of the analysis and the a priori assumptions regarding the residual variance. It appears that none of the methods has a universal application. Differences among the models discussed are illustrated by a bivariate morphometric analysis of cerebrocortical regions in primates.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3540465pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3540465pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3540465pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3540465pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3540465pubmed:monthOctlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3540465pubmed:issn0165-0270lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3540465pubmed:authorpubmed-author:UylingsH BHBlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3540465pubmed:authorpubmed-author:HofmanM AMAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3540465pubmed:authorpubmed-author:LaanA CAClld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3540465pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3540465pubmed:volume18lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3540465pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3540465pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3540465pubmed:pagination103-14lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3540465pubmed:dateRevised2003-11-14lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3540465pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3540465-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3540465pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3540465-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3540465pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3540465-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3540465pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3540465-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3540465pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3540465-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3540465pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3540465-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3540465pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3540465-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3540465pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3540465-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3540465pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3540465-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3540465pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3540465-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3540465pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3540465-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3540465pubmed:year1986lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3540465pubmed:articleTitleBivariate linear models in neurobiology: problems of concept and methodology.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3540465pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:3540465lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:3540465lld:pubmed