Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:3519943rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3519943lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0376507lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:3519943lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0180979lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:3519943lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1707689lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:3519943pubmed:issue5lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3519943pubmed:dateCreated1986-7-2lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3519943pubmed:abstractTextThis study was designed as a comparative analysis of the compressive strengths of precious versus nonprecious metals with various framework designs used in clinical restorations. One hundred thirty-five statistically uniform ceramometal restorations were fabricated. The restorations were cemented to the die and then subjected to stroke-control compression forces in an Instron loading machine. Simulated clinical failure was recorded by the Instron load cell recorder in pounds of load.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3519943pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3519943pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3519943pubmed:citationSubsetDlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3519943pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3519943pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3519943pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3519943pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3519943pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3519943pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3519943pubmed:monthMaylld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3519943pubmed:issn0022-3913lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3519943pubmed:authorpubmed-author:GoodkindR JRJlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3519943pubmed:authorpubmed-author:GerberichW...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3519943pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MarkerJ CJClld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3519943pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3519943pubmed:volume55lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3519943pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3519943pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3519943pubmed:pagination560-7lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3519943pubmed:dateRevised2006-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3519943pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3519943-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3519943pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3519943-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3519943pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3519943-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3519943pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3519943-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3519943pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3519943-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3519943pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3519943-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3519943pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3519943-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3519943pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3519943-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3519943pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3519943-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3519943pubmed:year1986lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3519943pubmed:articleTitleThe compressive strength of nonprecious versus precious ceramometal restorations with various frame designs.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3519943pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3519943pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed