Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:3510823rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3510823lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0030705lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:3510823lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0034656lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:3510823lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0028005lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:3510823lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0028066lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:3510823lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0340288lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:3510823lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0699826lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:3510823lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1707455lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:3510823pubmed:issue2lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3510823pubmed:dateCreated1986-3-10lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3510823pubmed:abstractTextForty-one patients were studied in a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled crossover trial to compare the antianginal actions of nicardipine 30 mg thrice daily and nifedipine 10 mg thrice daily. Efficacy was assessed using objective criteria from computer-assisted multistage graded exercise testing, performed after a two-week placebo run-in period and at the end of each four-week active treatment period. Thirty-seven patients completed both legs of the crossover trial. The mean (+/- standard error of the mean) baseline exercise time to development of angina was 6.7 +/- 0.4 min and this increased to 9.5 +/- 0.6 min on nicardipine (p less than 0.001) and 9.5 +/- 0.5 min on nifedipine (p less than 0.001 vs baseline; NS vs nicardipine). Both drugs significantly prolonged the time to the development of 1mm ST segment depression. The baseline resting heart rate of 83 +/- 2 beats/min increased to 87 +/- 3 beats/min during nicardipine (p less than 0.05) and remained unaltered at 83 +/- 2 beats/min during nifedipine therapy (p = NS vs baseline and p less than 0.02 vs nicardipine). Similarly, both drugs increased significantly the maximal heart rate at peak exercise. One patient was lost to follow-up during the placebo run-in period and four patients (two each on nicardipine and nifedipine) were withdrawn due to adverse effects. Our results indicate that nicardipine is comparable in efficacy to nifedipine and has a similar adverse effect profile and can also be considered a useful therapeutic agent for the treatment of chronic stable angina pectoris.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3510823pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3510823pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3510823pubmed:citationSubsetAIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3510823pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3510823pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3510823pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3510823pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3510823pubmed:monthFeblld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3510823pubmed:issn0012-3692lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3510823pubmed:authorpubmed-author:RafteryE BEBlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3510823pubmed:authorpubmed-author:O'HaraM JMJlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3510823pubmed:authorpubmed-author:KhurmiN SNSlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3510823pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BowlesM JMJlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3510823pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3510823pubmed:volume89lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3510823pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3510823pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3510823pubmed:pagination260-5lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3510823pubmed:dateRevised2007-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3510823pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3510823-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3510823pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3510823-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3510823pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3510823-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3510823pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3510823-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3510823pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3510823-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3510823pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3510823-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3510823pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3510823-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3510823pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3510823-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3510823pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3510823-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3510823pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3510823-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3510823pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3510823-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3510823pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3510823-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3510823pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3510823-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3510823pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3510823-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3510823pubmed:year1986lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3510823pubmed:articleTitleRandomized double-blind placebo-controlled comparison of nicardipine and nifedipine in patients with chronic stable angina pectoris.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3510823pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3510823pubmed:publicationTypeClinical Triallld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3510823pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3510823pubmed:publicationTypeRandomized Controlled Triallld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:3510823lld:pubmed