Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:3441160rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3441160lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0009452lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:3441160lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1947951lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:3441160lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1707455lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:3441160lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0243111lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:3441160lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1879313lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:3441160lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1554960lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:3441160pubmed:issue10lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3441160pubmed:dateCreated1988-4-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3441160pubmed:abstractTextTwo transdermal diffusion cell apparatuses--the Franz diffusion cell and the Thomas diffusion cell--were compared with each other, using coumarin as a model drug in two different (one hydrophilic and one lipophilic) vehicles.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3441160pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3441160pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3441160pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3441160pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3441160pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3441160pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3441160pubmed:monthOctlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3441160pubmed:issn0379-0355lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3441160pubmed:authorpubmed-author:RitschelW AWAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3441160pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BarkhausJ KJKlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3441160pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3441160pubmed:volume9lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3441160pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3441160pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3441160pubmed:pagination673-6lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3441160pubmed:dateRevised2006-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3441160pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3441160-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3441160pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3441160-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3441160pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3441160-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3441160pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3441160-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3441160pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3441160-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3441160pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3441160-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3441160pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3441160-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3441160pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3441160-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3441160pubmed:year1987lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3441160pubmed:articleTitleA comparison of two transdermal diffusion apparatuses: a brief communication.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3441160pubmed:affiliationDivision of Pharmaceutics and Drug Delivery Systems, University of Cincinnati, Ohio.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3441160pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3441160pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3441160pubmed:publicationTypeIn Vitrolld:pubmed