Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:3385415rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3385415lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0034746lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:3385415lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0079809lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:3385415lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0439781lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:3385415pubmed:issue2lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3385415pubmed:dateCreated1988-7-29lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3385415pubmed:abstractTextWe employed both simple and choice reaction time (RT) paradigms in which the subjects were required to respond to 3.0 cycles per degree (c/d) square-wave gratings presented to one eye, while checkerboard masks were presented at various stimulus-onset asynchronies to the other eye. No masking was evident using the simple RT paradigm, but with the choice RT task, checkerboard masks presented to the contralateral eye of three subjects resulted in substantial decreases in response speed when the test preceded the mask by stimulus-onset asynchronies of 25 to 75 ms. Masks that contained lower fundamental spatial frequencies (1.0 c/d) than the target were more effective than masks containing fundamental spatial frequencies (6.0 c/d) higher than the target, while masks that contained fundamental components identical to those in the target (3.0 c/d) produced maximum masking. The results offer support for the sustained-transient theory of visual processing and validate RT as a technique for examining spatio-temporal factors in masking.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3385415pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3385415pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3385415pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3385415pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3385415pubmed:monthAprlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3385415pubmed:issn0022-1309lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3385415pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MayJ GJGlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3385415pubmed:authorpubmed-author:DunlapW PWPlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3385415pubmed:authorpubmed-author:GrannisS WSWlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3385415pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3385415pubmed:volume115lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3385415pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3385415pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3385415pubmed:pagination171-85lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3385415pubmed:dateRevised2004-11-17lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3385415pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3385415-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3385415pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3385415-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3385415pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3385415-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3385415pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3385415-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3385415pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3385415-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3385415pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3385415-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3385415pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3385415-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3385415pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3385415-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3385415pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3385415-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3385415pubmed:year1988lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3385415pubmed:articleTitleReaction time measures of backward masking.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3385415pubmed:affiliationDepartment of Psychology, University of New Orleans.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3385415pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed