Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:3357069rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3357069lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0001792lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:3357069lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0203028lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:3357069lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0007328lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:3357069pubmed:issue2lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3357069pubmed:dateCreated1988-5-16lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3357069pubmed:abstractTextThis case-control study tested the hypothesis that elderly women with metastatic breast cancer were previously screened less than controls. Cases included women over 60 years old who had metastatic breast cancer; the tumor registry provided controls. Identical criteria yielded comparable groups (cases = 109, controls = 211) receiving primary care at this tertiary center. Radiology and medical records were examined for mammograms; these were blindly categorized "diagnostic," "screening," or "indeterminant." The major, unexpected finding was that less than 6% of controls had ever had screening mammography. The associations between screening and metastatic cancer (odds ratios) suggest a beneficial effect of screening: OR/0.73 for ever screened and OR/0.71 if screened within the year of cancer diagnosis. All confidence intervals include one; however, low screening participation leaves this study with little power. The major implication is that despite the current recommendations, the elderly are not being included in screening mammography programs.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3357069pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3357069pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3357069pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3357069pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3357069pubmed:issn0884-8734lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3357069pubmed:authorpubmed-author:HulkaB SBSlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3357069pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BrownJ TJTlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3357069pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3357069pubmed:volume3lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3357069pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3357069pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3357069pubmed:pagination126-31lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3357069pubmed:dateRevised2009-2-24lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3357069pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3357069-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3357069pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3357069-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3357069pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3357069-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3357069pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3357069-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3357069pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3357069-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3357069pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3357069-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3357069pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3357069-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3357069pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3357069-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3357069pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3357069-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3357069pubmed:articleTitleScreening mammography in the elderly: a case-control study.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3357069pubmed:affiliationDivision of General Internal Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27706.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3357069pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3357069pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tlld:pubmed