Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:3307428rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3307428lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0002638lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:3307428lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0041633lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:3307428lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0032993lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:3307428lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0449468lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:3307428lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0456389lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:3307428pubmed:issue3lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3307428pubmed:dateCreated1987-10-22lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3307428pubmed:abstractTextExpectant management of prolonged pregnancy is predicated on reassuring biophysical testing. However, even the combination of a reactive nonstress test and normal amniotic fluid volume may not prevent subsequent morbidity. To test the hypothesis that diminished cord Wharton's jelly incurs risk of peripartum cord compression in addition to decreased amniotic fluid, 68 patients with confirmed gestational age greater than or equal to 41 weeks were evaluated prospectively with semiweekly nonstress tests and weekly ultrasound examinations. Amniotic fluid volume was assessed, and umbilical cord diameter was measured and then correlated with the quantity of Wharton's jelly at delivery, determined by cord circumference. A significant correlation between cord circumference and umbilical cord diameter was observed, even in those patients with decreased amniotic fluid volume. Either an amniotic fluid volume less than 3.8 cm or an umbilical cord diameter less than 1.6 cm was associated with significant cord compression patterns. Peripartum morbidity was greatest in the presence of a smaller cord and decreased fluid, suggesting a synergism between these two factors for the risk of cord compression in prolonged pregnancy.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3307428pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3307428pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3307428pubmed:citationSubsetAIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3307428pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3307428pubmed:monthSeplld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3307428pubmed:issn0002-9378lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3307428pubmed:authorpubmed-author:DooleyS LSLlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3307428pubmed:authorpubmed-author:DeppRRlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3307428pubmed:authorpubmed-author:TamuraR KRKlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3307428pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SilverR KRKlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3307428pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3307428pubmed:volume157lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3307428pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3307428pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3307428pubmed:pagination716-20lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3307428pubmed:dateRevised2004-11-17lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3307428pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3307428-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3307428pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3307428-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3307428pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3307428-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3307428pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3307428-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3307428pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3307428-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3307428pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3307428-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3307428pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3307428-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3307428pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3307428-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3307428pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3307428-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3307428pubmed:year1987lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3307428pubmed:articleTitleUmbilical cord size and amniotic fluid volume in prolonged pregnancy.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3307428pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed