Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:3287694rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3287694lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0235032lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:3287694lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0018767lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:3287694lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0234621lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:3287694lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0079809lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:3287694lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1637833lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:3287694pubmed:issue2-3lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3287694pubmed:dateCreated1988-6-28lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3287694pubmed:abstractTextThe application of auditory and visual evoked potentials (VEP) to neurotoxicity testing of humans and animals is reviewed. VEPs elicited by flash, reversing-checkerboard patterns, and sine wave grating are described. The flask evoked potential in rats is altered by exposure to many heavy metals, pesticides and solvents. The brainstem auditory evoked potential also appears to be sensitive to neurotoxic chemicals, but the evidence available is limited. The homology of auditory and visual evoked potentials in rats and humans is useful for cross-species extrapolation in neurotoxicology research.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3287694pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3287694pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3287694pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3287694pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3287694pubmed:monthMaylld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3287694pubmed:issn0300-483Xlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3287694pubmed:authorpubmed-author:DyerRRlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3287694pubmed:authorpubmed-author:JanssenRRlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3287694pubmed:authorpubmed-author:OttoDDlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3287694pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BoyerTTlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3287694pubmed:authorpubmed-author:HudnellKKlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3287694pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3287694pubmed:volume49lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3287694pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3287694pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3287694pubmed:pagination205-18lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3287694pubmed:dateRevised2004-11-17lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3287694pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3287694-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3287694pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3287694-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3287694pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3287694-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3287694pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3287694-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3287694pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3287694-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3287694pubmed:year1988lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3287694pubmed:articleTitleElectrophysiological measures of visual and auditory function as indices of neurotoxicity.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3287694pubmed:affiliationNeurotoxicology Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3287694pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3287694pubmed:publicationTypeReviewlld:pubmed