pubmed-article:327933 | rdf:type | pubmed:Citation | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:327933 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0004611 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:327933 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C1707455 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:327933 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0449851 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:327933 | pubmed:issue | 5 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:327933 | pubmed:dateCreated | 1977-8-25 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:327933 | pubmed:abstractText | Planktonic bacteria from an estuary were concentrated on membrane filters and counted with both a scanning electron microscope and an epi-illuminated fluorescent microscope. Counts on 0.2 micron Nuclepore filters (polycarbonate) were significantly higher (P less than 0.001) than counts on 0.2-micron Sartorius filters (cellulose). In contrast, there was not a statistically significant difference between the two techniques when Nuclepore filters were used (0.5 less than P less than 0.9). The average cell volume from this study area was 0.047 micron3. The estimated number of bacteria ranged from 10(6) to 10(7) bacteria per ml, representing from 4 to 40 mg of C per m3. | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:327933 | pubmed:commentsCorrections | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:327933 | pubmed:commentsCorrections | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:327933 | pubmed:commentsCorrections | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:327933 | pubmed:commentsCorrections | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:327933 | pubmed:commentsCorrections | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:327933 | pubmed:commentsCorrections | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:327933 | pubmed:commentsCorrections | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:327933 | pubmed:language | eng | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:327933 | pubmed:journal | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:327933 | pubmed:citationSubset | IM | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:327933 | pubmed:status | MEDLINE | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:327933 | pubmed:month | May | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:327933 | pubmed:issn | 0099-2240 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:327933 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:BowdenW BWB | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:327933 | pubmed:issnType | Print | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:327933 | pubmed:volume | 33 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:327933 | pubmed:owner | NLM | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:327933 | pubmed:authorsComplete | Y | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:327933 | pubmed:pagination | 1229-32 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:327933 | pubmed:dateRevised | 2010-9-2 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:327933 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:327933-E... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:327933 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:327933-B... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:327933 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:327933-B... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:327933 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:327933-S... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:327933 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:327933-W... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:327933 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:327933-M... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:327933 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:327933-M... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:327933 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:327933-M... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:327933 | pubmed:year | 1977 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:327933 | pubmed:articleTitle | Comparison of two direct-count techniques for enumerating aquatic bacteria. | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:327933 | pubmed:publicationType | Journal Article | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:327933 | pubmed:publicationType | Comparative Study | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:327933 | pubmed:publicationType | Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S. | lld:pubmed |
http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:327933 | lld:pubmed |
http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:327933 | lld:pubmed |
http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:327933 | lld:pubmed |
http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:327933 | lld:pubmed |
http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:327933 | lld:pubmed |
http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:327933 | lld:pubmed |
http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:327933 | lld:pubmed |
http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:327933 | lld:pubmed |
http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:327933 | lld:pubmed |
http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:327933 | lld:pubmed |
http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:327933 | lld:pubmed |
http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:327933 | lld:pubmed |
http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:327933 | lld:pubmed |
http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:327933 | lld:pubmed |
http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:327933 | lld:pubmed |
http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:327933 | lld:pubmed |
http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:327933 | lld:pubmed |
http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:327933 | lld:pubmed |
http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:327933 | lld:pubmed |
http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:327933 | lld:pubmed |
http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:327933 | lld:pubmed |
http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:327933 | lld:pubmed |
http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:327933 | lld:pubmed |
http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:327933 | lld:pubmed |